[pfSense-discussion] Cisco EtherChannel support in pfSense?

2007-03-09 Thread Kyle Mott
Is anybody interested? I've begun hacking together a package, would the developers be interested in taking it as either a third-party package or right into main-line pfSense? It does require some changes to the PHP init scripts and the addition of a modified kernel module (ng_fec.ko). It also a

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Cisco EtherChannel support in pfSense?

2007-03-09 Thread Bill Marquette
On 3/9/07, Kyle Mott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is anybody interested? I've begun hacking together a package, would the developers be interested in taking it as either a third-party package or right into main-line pfSense? It does require some changes to the PHP init scripts and the addition of a

RE: [pfSense-discussion] Cisco EtherChannel support in pfSense?

2007-03-10 Thread Greg Hennessy
> It also allows 802.1q VLAN's across the bonded NIC's (as long > the NIC's support VLANs). That would be useful indeed. Greg -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/714 - Release Date: 08/03/2007 10:58

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Cisco EtherChannel support in pfSense?

2007-03-11 Thread Kyle Mott
I'm having a hard time deciding whether or not to use a package or just modify the base system and provide diff's. Where should I send what I've got thus far so I can get some opinions on what I should do (package vs base)? -Kyle Bill Marquette wrote: On 3/9/07, Kyle Mott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Cisco EtherChannel support in pfSense?

2007-03-11 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 3/11/07, Kyle Mott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm having a hard time deciding whether or not to use a package or just modify the base system and provide diff's. Where should I send what I've got thus far so I can get some opinions on what I should do (package vs base)? This feels more like a