Re: [pfSense-discussion] SIP Phones and SIPROXD

2008-06-25 Thread Gary Buckmaster
Lee, First of all, I'm very glad to hear that the siproxy package is working so well for you. A lot of people have been needing this package and I think your experiences serve as good validation for people that this package is definitely ready for prime time. Secondly, thank you for the kin

Re: [pfSense-discussion] SIP Phones and SIPROXD

2008-06-25 Thread Lee J. Imber
Hi All, Just a follow up. I deployed the fixed version of siproxd into an 15 phone environment last night and all seems to be working perfectly. Thanks Jonathan for the idea of a OpenSER, I will have to take a look. If these solutions require any tweaking of the phone configs then they wi

Re: [pfSense-discussion] SIP Phones and SIPROXD

2008-06-16 Thread Jonathan GF
Althought the problem seems to be solver i would propose Lee to use a SIP router like OpenSER and/or a Media Gateway like Asterisk for VoIP purposes. The only equipments that will cross the firewall will be those ones and Lee can have the network infrastructure as he needs, among the benefits

Re: [pfSense-discussion] SIP Phones and SIPROXD

2008-06-16 Thread Paul Mansfield
although OP's issue now fixed, I would like to comment on siproxd and it's "features" siproxd has a bug whereby it doesn't bind properly to interfaces so that if you have a multi-homed firewall (e.g. I have a WAN, a cabled LAN and a wireless LAN all separate), then clients on one interface wil

Re: [pfSense-discussion] SIP Phones and SIPROXD

2008-06-14 Thread Chris Buechler
Lee is a commercial support customer and we helped him offlist with this. There was a problem with the siproxd package, it should now work. Lee confirmed he now has two phones working simultaneously, so this must be working now. If you have installed the package previously, uninstall it first. The

Re: [pfSense-discussion] SIP Phones and SIPROXD

2008-06-13 Thread Daniele Guazzoni
Sam Newnam Lead Solutions Engineer Apparent Source, LLC www.apparentsource.com 336-790-8780 -Original Message- From: Lee J. Imber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:48 PM To: discussion@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense-discussion] SIP Phones and SIPROXD Hi All,

RE: [pfSense-discussion] SIP Phones and SIPROXD

2008-06-13 Thread Sam Newnam
Source, LLC www.apparentsource.com 336-790-8780 -Original Message- From: Lee J. Imber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:48 PM To: discussion@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense-discussion] SIP Phones and SIPROXD Hi All, I am stuck and hoping someone here can help. Here

Re: [pfSense-discussion] SIP Phones and SIPROXD

2008-06-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, this is a common problem I run into when multiple NAT clients connect to the same IPSEC VPN server. Only the first one is allowed to connect, because the IPSEC server is refusing the other connections because they have the same external IP. Other firewalls get around this by using a poo

[pfSense-discussion] SIP Phones and SIPROXD

2008-06-13 Thread Lee J. Imber
Hi All, I am stuck and hoping someone here can help. Here is the situation. I have 10 SIP phones Polycom IP320's on a internal 10.0.0.x net. These phones then get dhcp from the pfsense 1.2-RELEASE box. Then out a cable modem to the phone provider. The Problem. I can only get one phone to wor