Agreed, I was speaking generally and strictly from testing I've seen
or done. I should have clarified that I was comparing with Cisco
AP12xx and not pfsense.
-
Nick Buraglio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 0x2E5B44F4
On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:48 AM, Jim Thompso
throughput. Wireless Ethernet has a LOT over
> >overhead data for beaconing, collision avoidance, etc, etc. The wireless
> >data rates reflect the raw bits that are being transferred, not just the
> >data.
> >
> >Nelson Papel
> >
> >-Original Message---
Nick Buraglio wrote:
Some of the centrally managed stuff can push over 30mbps "real
world", the Meru and Trapeze stuff supposedly can. This is of course
using something like iperf that just moves packets. Adding a B
client will of course slow it down.
these guys don't have anything that
ver
overhead data for beaconing, collision avoidance, etc, etc. The wireless
data rates reflect the raw bits that are being transferred, not just the
data.
Nelson Papel
-Original Message-----
From: Marc A. Volovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 5:21
To: discussion@p
ber 02, 2005 5:21
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WRAP and WAP
Quoth Holger Bauer:
Works great. I have several of these in use. However you won't get
108
You almost never get 108Mbit with anything, in my experience.
Rarely can
one obtain something approachin
eless
data rates reflect the raw bits that are being transferred, not just the
data.
Nelson Papel
-Original Message-
From: Marc A. Volovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 5:21
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] WRAP and WAP
Quoth Ho
Yes, 108 mbit/s is a theoretical not real life value. Just wanted to make this
clear ;-)
Holger
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Marc A. Volovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Dezember 2005 11:21
> An: discussion@pfsense.com
> Betreff: Re: [pfSense-d
Quoth Holger Bauer:
> Works great. I have several of these in use. However you won't get 108
You almost never get 108Mbit with anything, in my experience. Rarely can
one obtain something approaching 40Mbit...
But the WRAP itself works great.
--
---MAV
Marc A. Volovic
> Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Dezember 2005 11:07
> An: discussion@pfsense.com
> Betreff: [pfSense-discussion] WRAP and WAP
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just finished ordering a Wrap board (WRAP.1E-2 (3 LAN)), with a
> wireless card (Wriston CM9 IEE 802.11a/b/g 108Mbps WLAN Mini-P
Hi,
I've just finished ordering a Wrap board (WRAP.1E-2 (3 LAN)), with a
wireless card (Wriston CM9 IEE 802.11a/b/g 108Mbps WLAN Mini-PCI).
I'd like to use pfSense with this combi.
Is there anybody out there who can share his experience on this combi?
Rgds,
Henk
10 matches
Mail list logo
