>> Thanks, I might hit you up for that script when I get to it.
>>
>> I have a DSL/Cable modem setup(2 WAN) 1 DMZ and 1 LAN. I am getting ready
to
>> setup. I haven't worked with this before, and the routing tables are a
bit
>> confusing the first time through. I think I have the basics though.
On 8/18/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please share the script. It may be something we can turn into a
package depending on how it looks and works, etc.
Here it is:
http://rajasuperman.googlepages.com/monitor-gw.tgz
I've used the script for more than a month and it works wel
On 8/17/06, Heath Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, I might hit you up for that script when I get to it.
I have a DSL/Cable modem setup(2 WAN) 1 DMZ and 1 LAN. I am getting ready to
setup. I haven't worked with this before, and the routing tables are a bit
confusing the first time t
s for the information.
--
Heath Henderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1800 288 7750
--
> From: Raja Subramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:26:29 +0530
> To:
> Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] source-hash and sticky-address in pf pools
>
> On
On 8/18/06, Heath Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you use any special setup with this?
I'm using a stock RC2e box and my setup has been holding good
since RC1.
The only missing feature is that when a WAN link fails, the default
gateway is not automatically changed. This causes things
Henderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1800 288 7750
--
> From: Raja Subramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:02:08 +0530
> To:
> Subject: [pfSense-discussion] source-hash and sticky-address in pf pools
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a pfSense box with 5 wan
On 8/17/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
slbd isn't used for gateway balancing, just for monitoring the
gateways. The sticky patches that Scott committed (not me) were for
server load balancing.
My apologies, I thought he was talking about incoming load balancing.
On 8/17/06, Raja Subramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have a pfSense box with 5 wan links, 1 wan and 1 dmz and
the load balancing and policy based routing in pfSense is
simply fantastic.
The one missing feature that I would like to see, is the ability to
specify the source-hash or stick
On 8/17/06, Raja Subramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have a pfSense box with 5 wan links, 1 wan and 1 dmz and
the load balancing and policy based routing in pfSense is
simply fantastic.
The one missing feature that I would like to see, is the ability to
specify the source-hash or stick
Hi,
I have a pfSense box with 5 wan links, 1 wan and 1 dmz and
the load balancing and policy based routing in pfSense is
simply fantastic.
The one missing feature that I would like to see, is the ability to
specify the source-hash or sticky-address option in pf pools.
With this, I would be able
10 matches
Mail list logo
