-
> From: "Joe Lagreca"
> To: discussion@pfsense.com
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:48:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Traffic shaping VOIP on low bandwidth
> connections?
>
> The problem is that I have already done th
t;
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joe Lagreca"
> To: discussion@pfsense.com
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:43:26 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Traffic shaping VOIP on low bandwidth
> connections?
>
> With the
fsense.com
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:43:26 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Traffic shaping VOIP on low bandwidth
> connections?
>
> With the traffic shaper turned off, I get about 1340 kb/sec both ways.
> What should I set the traffic
used for one G.729 channel)), perhaps 384Kbps to play
it safe.
Regards,
Adrian
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Lagreca"
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:43:26 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Traffic shap
With the traffic shaper turned off, I get about 1340 kb/sec both ways.
What should I set the traffic shapers inbound bandwidth to? Should
the outbound be the same?
Also, when it asks for reserving bandwidth for VOIP, what should I set
that to? I have it set to 384 or 512 right now. But I'm not
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Joe Lagreca wrote:
> I have a T-1 (1.54mb symmetrical) for our data connection. Whenever
> there is a big download filling the pipe, the inbound voice chops.
>
> When I set the inbound traffic to 1450kb (tested all the way down to
> 1000kb), I got VERY bad result
While http is probably most common, its not all the big bursty traffic.
Has nobody got VOIP working on a low bandwidth connection using
pfsense? I figured it would be easy with the traffic shaper, but it
doesn't seem to be working as well as I thought.
Surely someone has a good working configura
Joe,
Assuming you mean HTTP downloads, you could try B/W limiting in squid
(Proxy Server:Traffic Management).
Colin
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 23:12, Joe Lagreca wrote:
> I have a T-1 (1.54mb symmetrical) for our data connection. Whenever
> there is a big download filling the pipe, the inbound vo
I have a T-1 (1.54mb symmetrical) for our data connection. Whenever
there is a big download filling the pipe, the inbound voice chops.
When I set the inbound traffic to 1450kb (tested all the way down to
1000kb), I got VERY bad results. Audio was VERY choppy inbound, and
ping latency to the inte
On 7/29/05, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Requests:
> 1 - Could we have the 'Parent' queue as well as
> "Flags PriorityDefault Bandwidth" on firewall_shaper_queues.php ?
It should be there. What scheduler are you using?
> 2- If I edit a queue, this turns the shaper ON. Since it usua
Requests:
1 - Could we have the 'Parent' queue as well as
"Flags PriorityDefault Bandwidth" on firewall_shaper_queues.php ?
2- If I edit a queue, this turns the shaper ON. Since it usually takes
me some time to figure out a reasonable shaping strategy, this is a
problem. Could this featur
On 7/23/05, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was looking at the queue display and noticed that although VOIP is
> being allocated a good portion of bandwidth, that there are a log of
> dropped packets. What exactly does that mean, and what can I do to
> limit the drops?
Allocate enough
I was looking at the queue display and noticed that although VOIP is
being allocated a good portion of bandwidth, that there are a log of
dropped packets. What exactly does that mean, and what can I do to
limit the drops?
--
When It Absolutely, Positively has to be Destroyed Overnight!!!
13 matches
Mail list logo
