> I think he understood,
He did :-).
> but was suggesting other virtualization ideas that he felt would be a more
> rewarding use of developer resources.
Indeed and stay within the scope of what Scott et al have delivered with bells
on over the past several years.
Greg
---
700
> From: aoz@gmail.com
> To: discussion@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] xen aware pfsense.
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 16:19, pfsense sense wrote:
> > point taken but it wouldn't be "adding [file | virtual | foo] server
> > features" it
m: aoz@gmail.com> To:
> discussion@pfsense.com> Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] xen aware pfsense.>
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 16:19, pfsense sense wrote:>
> > point taken but it wouldn't be "adding [file | virtual | foo] server> >
> features" it wo
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 16:19, pfsense sense wrote:
> point taken but it wouldn't be "adding [file | virtual | foo] server
> features" it would only be "pfsense --> VT"
>
> i'm no security expert, in any stretch of the imagination, I would have
> expected that the suggested addition of a dom0 woul
point taken but it wouldn't be "adding [file | virtual | foo] server
features" it would only be "pfsense --> VT"
i'm no security expert, in any stretch of the imagination, I would have
expected that the suggested addition of a dom0 would/could be fully
protected, due to dom0 sitting behind pfsense
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 15:31, pfsense sense wrote:
> Ignoring the lack of Xen dom0 support in FreeBSD for a moment, of course.
I definitely misunderstood your original post, my apologies. That
being said, there isn't and doesn't soon look to be much motion within
FreeBSD to provide dom0 support
ll solve the problem?
-Adrian
- Original Message -
From: "pfsense sense"
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 5:13:42 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] xen aware pfsense.
" multiple concurrent PFSense instances"
no, you
;
>> or
>>
>> Juniper VSYS :
>> http://www.juniper.net/solutions/literature/white_papers/200103.pdf
>>
>> Does have a certain attraction from a managed service perspective.
>>
>> Hosting applications within domUs running on PFSense. A complete waste of
>
aste of
> time.
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------
> *From:* pfsense sense [pfse...@kavadas.org]
> *Sent:* 28 January 2009 00:42
> *To:* discussion@pfsense.com
> *Subject:* [pfSense-discussion] xen aware pfsense.
>
> has anyone
te of time.
Greg
From: pfsense sense [pfse...@kavadas.org]
Sent: 28 January 2009 00:42
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense-discussion] xen aware pfsense.
has anyone considered the possibility of intergrating xen with pfsense ?
i might be loosing my mind
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:15 PM, pfsense sense wrote:
> i'm not suggesting pfsense be run inside a VM, i am suggesting pfsense
> provide VM functionality
Refer back to my earlier post.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-u
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:15 PM, pfsense sense wrote:
> i'm not suggesting pfsense be run inside a VM, i am suggesting pfsense
> provide VM functionality
> i'm fully aware the VM's shortcomings, i manage a 14TB ESX cluster
> let me say that again...
>
> i am suggesting pfsense provide VM func
i'm not suggesting pfsense be run inside a VM, i am suggesting pfsense
provide VM functionality
i'm fully aware the VM's shortcomings, i manage a 14TB ESX cluster
let me say that again...
i am suggesting pfsense provide VM functionality "cloud --> pfsense -->
os --> service"
On Wed, Ja
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 17:42, pfsense sense wrote:
> has anyone considered the possibility of intergrating xen with pfsense ?
>
> i might be loosing my mind but wouldn't it be nice to have a pfsense running
> on harware and a vistualization environemnt that allow us to install our
> OS's of choic
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 17:42, pfsense sense wrote:
> has anyone considered the possibility of intergrating xen with pfsense ?
>
> i might be loosing my mind but wouldn't it be nice to have a pfsense running
> on harware and a vistualization environemnt that allow us to install our
> OS's of choic
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:42 PM, pfsense sense wrote:
> has anyone considered the possibility of intergrating xen with pfsense ?
>
It's ok in some circumstances, bad in others. The primary difficulty
is lack of FreeBSD dom0 Xen support.
---
fsense.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:42:18 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [pfSense-discussion] xen aware pfsense.
has anyone considered the possibility of intergrating xen with pfsense ?
i might be loosing my mind but wouldn't it be nice to have a pfsense running on
harware
has anyone considered the possibility of intergrating xen with pfsense ?
i might be loosing my mind but wouldn't it be nice to have a pfsense running
on harware and a vistualization environemnt that allow us to install our
OS's of choice perfectly protected behind pfsense ?
does anything else thi
18 matches
Mail list logo
