i may be wrong here however i thought there was a default time server sync
setup in the config?
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I noticed that pfSense makes frequent connections to time servers (udp123)
> but eventhough I didn't configure anyt
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:00 PM, jason whitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i may be wrong here however i thought there was a default time server sync
> setup in the config?
There is. Look in System->General. Bottom of the page I believe.
--Bill
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Posted At: Thursday, March 06, 2008 1:55 AM
|Posted To: pfSense
|Conversation: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service
|Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service
|
|
|On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:00 PM, jason whitt
|<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> i may
Hey, You probably are seeing a few ADSL subscribers.
0.pfsense.pool.ntp.orgis a distributed cluster (a pool of servers),
not just one server. Check out
http://www.pool.ntp.org/ for more info.
Cheers, Jason Hensler
Return Receipt
Your RE: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service
document
: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service
Hey, You probably are seeing a few ADSL subscribers.
0.pfsense.pool.ntp.org is a distributed cluster (a pool of servers), not
just one server. Check out http://www.pool.ntp.org/ for more info.
Cheers, Jason Hensler
me Service
|Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service
|
|
|On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:00 PM, jason whitt
|<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> i may be wrong here however i thought there was a default
|time server sync
|> setup in the config?
|
|There is. Look in System->Gener
No, really - I asked you once in private, now I ask you again in
public: please turn off your foolish Outlook receipts. It is
ridiculous that we have to wade through your mail client's automated
spew that just tells us you received/read a given message. Most of us
really don't care (or actively di
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 01:32:11PM +, Paul M wrote:
> I too have asked him privately. I suspect he's using Lotus Notes or
> something equally horrible which cannot be configured sanely!
That's what God invented webmail for.
> Can the list admin get the mail system changed to strip the reci
> The correct course of action is to boot him off on first offense.
This makes seven on my count
RB wrote:
> No, really - I asked you once in private, now I ask you again in
I too have asked him privately. I suspect he's using Lotus Notes or
something equally horrible which cannot be configured sanely!
Can the list admin get the mail system changed to strip the recipient
request headers out?
Return Receipt
Your RE: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service
document
Bwa ha ha! Delicious, delicious irony! I knew it was inevitable
since Ryan had to read the thread at least once more before fixing
things, but it was worth it to see this one come in.
On 3/6/08, Ryan Neily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Return Receipt
>
> Your document: RE: [
te:
>> Return Receipt
>>
>> Your document: RE: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service
>>
>> was received by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> at: 03/06/2008 09:22:47 EST
--------------------|
|Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service
|
>-
> Return Receipt
> >>
> >> Your document: RE: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service
> >>
> >> was received by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> at: 03/06/2008 09:22:47 EST
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
___
Return Receipt
Your Re: [pfSense-discussion] pfSense / Time Service
document
Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 02:53:19PM +, Paul M wrote:
>> RB wrote:
>>> Bwa ha ha! Delicious, delicious irony! I knew it was inevitable
>>> since Ryan had to read the thread at least once more before fixing
>>> things, but it was worth it to see this one come in.
>> has he f
-|
|>
| Subject: |
|>
>--------------------------
> The real problem is that the %^$%^#$& mail program I am using does not allow
> you to turn of return receipts.
Corporate standards for the win! I feel for you, as your situation is
very similar to what initially drove me to use my own address versus a
corporate one.
> Anyhow, it's fixed now.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Ryan Neily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyhow, it's fixed now. You can go on complaining about something else...
Since you asked, please stop sending HTML emails to the list and use
plain text, it makes things so much more readable in most MUAs and in
the mail arc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 6-3-2008 7:43:
A, now I see :-)
Thanks
/Claus/
hi Claus,
FYI, the NTP pool introduced a geolocation DNS system a few months ago,
mainly because of load distribution problems in the european pool zones.
This explains why you see nearby servers, even when using
22 matches
Mail list logo