Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:12:42AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Quick question: Why is bytecode considered an alternate binary format?
it is portable between architectures so it seems like it could also be a
candidate for /usr/share. A related question, though, wo
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:12:42AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
>> Howdy all,
>>
>> A little while ago on debian-python, we discussed the location of
>> system files that are executable bytecode, created by package
>> management tools at install time, and how to comply with the
Ben Finney wrote:
Howdy all,
A little while ago on debian-python, we discussed the location of
system files that are executable bytecode, created by package
management tools at install time, and how to comply with the FHS.
Ben Finney writes:
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
As f
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 15:38 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> This issue applies just as much to other packages with byte-compiled
> languages (e.g. Elisp bytecode, Java bytecode, etc.) so I'm raising it
> on debian-devel.
Hi,
It seems that you entered the wrong address for this message,
is that the cas
Howdy all,
A little while ago on debian-python, we discussed the location of
system files that are executable bytecode, created by package
management tools at install time, and how to comply with the FHS.
Ben Finney writes:
> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As for the FHS arg
