At 02:09 PM 01/17/2006 -0600, Ian Bicking wrote:
>Since they have a 5-second delay in downloading, I assume they really
>are trying to get ad clicks (since 1 or 0 seconds would do just as well,
>and direct links would of course be better for everyone). OTOH, it
>never hurts to ask; maybe someone c
At 07:54 PM 01/17/2006 +0100, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
>Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all. Ian Bicking reported an issue with Sourceforge's download process
> > changing again; I've updated setuptools in SVN but haven't made a new
> > release yet. If you need the fixed version, upd
Kevin Dangoor wrote:
>>This is a probably a FAQ, but maybe the Sourceforge guys can be talked into
>>providing some machine-friendly way for downloading files?
>
>
> The problem is that a machine doesn't click on ads. (Or, at least,
> isn't supposed to :)
Since they have a 5-second delay in down
On 1/17/06, Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Hi all. Ian Bicking reported an issue with Sourceforge's download process
> > changing again; I've updated setuptools in SVN but haven't made a new
> > release yet. If you need the fixed versi
Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all. Ian Bicking reported an issue with Sourceforge's download process
> changing again; I've updated setuptools in SVN but haven't made a new
> release yet. If you need the fixed version, update to the development
> version via "ez_setup.py setupt
Hi all. Ian Bicking reported an issue with Sourceforge's download process
changing again; I've updated setuptools in SVN but haven't made a new
release yet. If you need the fixed version, update to the development
version via "ez_setup.py setuptools==dev" for now. Thanks.
___
