Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> I have a set of extensions that use SWIG to wrap my own C++ library.
>> This library, on a day-to-day basis is built against VS8 since the rest
>> of our product suite is. Right now I have no way to work with this code
>> using VS8 since the standard distribution is buil
> -Original Message-
> From: "Martin v. Löwis" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Just imagine the a school teacher who in good faith wants to
> introduce
> > his pupils to the wonderful programming language of Python, but
> > when he installs it, all kinds of scary looking warnings drive him
>
I found a report on bugzilla.redhat.com, "Bug 236535 Processed:
brp-python-bytecompile does not work with bdist-rpm target" and am cc:'ing
the cc: list for that bug on this email.
I posted a comment to that bug strongly urging the Fedora packaging people
and the Python packaging people to get thei
At 02:10 PM 5/29/2007 -0400, Stanley A. Klein wrote:
>I found a report on bugzilla.redhat.com, "Bug 236535 Processed:
>brp-python-bytecompile does not work with bdist-rpm target" and am cc:'ing
>the cc: list for that bug on this email.
>
>I posted a comment to that bug strongly urging the Fedora pa
On Tue, May 29, 2007 3:43 pm, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 02:10 PM 5/29/2007 -0400, Stanley A. Klein wrote:
>>I found a report on bugzilla.redhat.com, "Bug 236535 Processed:
>>brp-python-bytecompile does not work with bdist-rpm target" and am
>> cc:'ing
>>the cc: list for that bug on this email.
>>
Funny how the solutions you advocated were the exact same solutions I
advocated in the Fedora bugtracker months ago.
I switched to KUbuntu. Thanks for the workaround tho.
Please do NOT choose option 2, there's no reason to bend over to Fedora
just because they're the second largest one, and ther
At 04:20 PM 5/29/2007 -0400, Stanley A. Klein wrote:
>I used your workaround and got the rpms. However, I also got a traceback,
>attached below. I think this is another problem in setuptools, because
>(IIRC) I saw a posting relating to it.
I believe that was fixed in 0.6c5, if not, then in 0.6c6
> One feature that is easily addable and will certainly make installing
> python on vista nicer, is to add authenticode signing to the install.
This I question very much. I experimented with authenticode before 2.4,
and found it an unacceptable experience. When the MSI file starts
running, install
Hi,
>> One feature that is easily addable and will certainly make installing
>> python on vista nicer, is to add authenticode signing to the install.
I'm +1 on authenticode.
> This I question very much. I experimented with authenticode before 2.4,
> and found it an unacceptable experience. When
Hi,
>> One feature that is easily addable and will certainly make installing
>> python on vista nicer, is to add authenticode signing to the install.
I'm +1 on authenticode.
> This I question very much. I experimented with authenticode before 2.4,
> and found it an unacceptable experience. When
>> Certainly. However, telling them that they have to wait just so that
>> Windows finds out what they know already (that this is the MSI file
>> from the Python Software Foundation, or from Martin v. Löwis) is
>> even more nasty.
>
> Educated, adult developers with good internet connections may k
11 matches
Mail list logo
