On 7/7/07, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then there'd also be "python module:object", and "file
> filename.py:object". Maybe "python " would be the default, I'm not
> sure.
I'd be in favor of not having a default expression type for this, but
to require it to be spelled out every time.
Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> On Jul 6, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Ian Bicking wrote:
>
>> Incidentally, something that would be nice with wsgiconfig is if we
>> could all agree on how to specify things like entry points and objects.
>> Specifically Paste Deploy uses egg:Distribution#ep_name, and
>> zc.buildou
Hi Jim, thanks for your time.
>> and nor does running bin/buildout. The
>> result is that the Routes install fails with
>> The required version of setuptools (>=0.6c6) is not available, ...
>
> I tried to reproduce this, but was unable to.
Here's what I did on a clean ubuntu server from the VMWar
At 10:12 AM 7/7/2007 -0600, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
>On Jun 19, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>
> >> 2. The resulting egg file is much larger than the .zip file
> >> created by
> >> 'python setup.py sdist' in spite of exclude_package_data = { '':
> >> ['*.pyc','*.pyo']},
> >>
> >> Is
On Jun 19, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>> 2. The resulting egg file is much larger than the .zip file
>> created by
>> 'python setup.py sdist' in spite of exclude_package_data = { '':
>> ['*.pyc','*.pyo']},
>>
>> Is there any way to exclude .pyc and .pyo files?
>
> No; you can excl
On Jul 7, 2007, at 1:20 AM, Mark Hammond wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
>> Since you happen to be paying attention to distributions atm ... :)
>>
>> I would love to see a pywin32 egg, which by definition, didn't need
>> to modify anything when it was installed. I guess there are some
>> features in pywin32 t
Am Samstag, den 07.07.2007, 14:22 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
> +1 for adding this option. Without such an option, it's pretty hard to
> specify you only want actual final releases, unless you tie down the
> release number entirely. A project has a harder time releasing betas of
> their next
Hey,
Jim Fulton wrote:
> I think easy_install and setuptools should provide a similar option
> and provide a way (presumably through setup.cfg) to make it the
> default. For backward compatibility reasons, it may not be possible
> to make this the default policy for setuptools, although, ar
At 03:20 PM 7/7/2007 +1000, Mark Hammond wrote:
>Hi Jim,
>
> > Since you happen to be paying attention to distributions atm ... :)
> >
> > I would love to see a pywin32 egg, which by definition, didn't need
> > to modify anything when it was installed. I guess there are some
> > features in pywin32
