Re: [Distutils] alternatives to zc.buildout?

2008-02-10 Thread zooko
On Feb 10, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2008, at 2:01 PM, Noah Gift wrote: >> In reference to this rather long discussion. I would love to get an >> interview or case study on buildout in the scope of package >> management for Python for the book I am co-authoring on Pytho

Re: [Distutils] alternatives to zc.buildout?

2008-02-10 Thread Jim Fulton
On Feb 10, 2008, at 2:01 PM, Noah Gift wrote: > In reference to this rather long discussion. I would love to get an > interview or case study on buildout in the scope of package > management for Python for the book I am co-authoring on Python For > *nix Systems Administration. If there is

Re: [Distutils] alternatives to zc.buildout?

2008-02-10 Thread Noah Gift
> > I like buildout for development be because I don't have to "inhabit" > the created artifacts. I (can) have a single high-level configuration > that lets me control a variety of subsystems in one place. > > I'm sure this is a matter of taste. > > Jim > > -- > Jim Fulton > Zope Corporation In re

Re: [Distutils] alternatives to zc.buildout?

2008-02-10 Thread Jim Fulton
On Feb 9, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Martin Aspeli wrote: >> Tres Seaver wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Chris Withers wrote: Hi All, What are the alternatives to zc.buildout?