Floris Bruynooghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it would be really good if we could agree on a simple
> solution for this problem. However I haven't really seen an
> agreement come out of this thread. So far what (I think) some
> proposed solutions are:
>
> 1 Have a different path in /usr
On Apr 18, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
> is it possible to get hold of the buildout configuration of part A
> from within the recipe configured for part B?
Yes. The __init__ method of a recipe can read other section options
using buildout[section_name][option_name].
Note that any d
Hi,
is it possible to get hold of the buildout configuration of part A from
within the recipe configured for part B? Usecase: the configuration of part
A should work as blueprint for actions performed through the recipe
configured for part B.
Andreas
pgp2MssMhH5Kh.pgp
Description: PGP signa
At 12:02 PM 4/18/2008 -0400, Alexander Michael wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Chris Withers
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alexander Michael wrote:
> >
> > > By default, setuptools enabled setup.py's install eggs (either zipped
> > > or unzipped) so that you can multiple version instal
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander Michael wrote:
>
> > By default, setuptools enabled setup.py's install eggs (either zipped
> > or unzipped) so that you can multiple version installed (but only one
> > active, of course). If you want to install
Jim Fulton wrote:
>
>> What platform? --home is ignored on windows.
>
> Sorry, I didn't read your note carefully enough.
>
> --home says to use a unix-style layout rooted at the given directory.
>
> I believe you want --install-lib
python2.4 setup.py install --install-lib=$INSTANCE/lib/python
Your right, Tarek. This is much more sane. Many thanks for the advice.
Regards,
David
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:11 PM, David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It looks like what I should be doing is subclassing Command from
>> setuptools, then passing in user options. I'll
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:11 PM, David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like what I should be doing is subclassing Command from
> setuptools, then passing in user options. I'll be trying a few things
> out this way but any additional info would be helpful. Many thanks.
or you can use
It looks like what I should be doing is subclassing Command from
setuptools, then passing in user options. I'll be trying a few things
out this way but any additional info would be helpful. Many thanks.
Regards,
David
David Pratt wrote:
> Hi. What would be the best way of programatically making
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:30 AM, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
> > Chris Withers wrote:
> >> ...however, this is leaving me with an easy-install.pth and a .egg file
> >> in $INSTANCE_HOME,
>
> Okay, so the .egg is actually a directory and not a file.
> ...and
On Apr 18, 2008, at 8:28 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> On Apr 18, 2008, at 6:19 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm trying to install a package into a Zope INSTANCE_HOME with:
>>
>> python2.4 setup.py install --home=$INSTANCE_HOME
>>
>> ...however, this is leaving me with an easy-install.pth
On Apr 18, 2008, at 6:19 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to install a package into a Zope INSTANCE_HOME with:
>
> python2.4 setup.py install --home=$INSTANCE_HOME
>
> ...however, this is leaving me with an easy-install.pth and a .egg
> file
> in $INSTANCE_HOME, even though the
Ben Finney wrote:
> Stephen Waterbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> "system Python" -- the Python (and its site-pkgs, etc.) that any
>> Python scripts used by the OS depend on, which would of course be
>> solely determined by the OS.
>>
>> This would be distinct, in my proposal, from any packag
Chris Withers wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> ...however, this is leaving me with an easy-install.pth and a .egg file
>> in $INSTANCE_HOME,
Okay, so the .egg is actually a directory and not a file.
...and in there is lurking the package I'm trying install.
Why all this convolution? Why not ins
Chris Withers wrote:
> ...however, this is leaving me with an easy-install.pth and a .egg file
> in $INSTANCE_HOME,
...should have been "in $INSTANCE_HOME/lib/python".
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Hi All,
I'm trying to install a package into a Zope INSTANCE_HOME with:
python2.4 setup.py install --home=$INSTANCE_HOME
...however, this is leaving me with an easy-install.pth and a .egg file
in $INSTANCE_HOME, even though the package has zip_safe=False in its
setup.py.
What gives?
cheers,
Hi. What would be the best way of programatically making eggs as opposed
to python setup.py bdist_egg sdist on the command line. Many thanks.
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 07:59:21AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2008, at 9:41 PM, Stephen Waterbury wrote:
> >
> > I used to always set up my own Python[s] in /usr/local
> > and put that first in my PATH, but I have gotten lazy lately, and
> > sometimes it will bite me. ;)
>
> On Debian
18 matches
Mail list logo
