Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
So once again, I think this boils down to these questions: if we have a
small library whose sole purpose is to abstract a data store so you can
find out where a particular non-code file lives on this system will you
use it?
As part of the stdlib? Yes, I'd use it.
--
Gre
2008/10/17 Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> So once again, I think this boils down to these questions: if we have a
>> small library whose sole purpose is to abstract a data store so you can
>> find out where a particular non-code file lives on this system will you
>> use it?
>
> I would. I ap
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
So I have a question for all the developers on this list. Philip thinks
that using symlinks will drive adoption better than an API to access
package data. I think an API will have better adoption than a symlink
hack. But the real question is what do people who maintain p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 17, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
7) Philip says that the reason pkg_resources does not see widespread
adoption is that the developer cost of using an API is too high
compared
to __file__. I don't believe that the difference be
So I have a question for all the developers on this list. Philip thinks
that using symlinks will drive adoption better than an API to access
package data. I think an API will have better adoption than a symlink
hack. But the real question is what do people who maintain packages
think? Since Phi
Hello,
I would like to discuss a patch that adds executable .bat files for
scripts installed with distutils.
As a windows user with several Python versions installed I often
create shortcuts for Python applications that were installed using
distutils. But I also have to navigate to Scripts/ direc
