At 04:44 PM 10/19/2008 -0700, Garrett Cooper (garrcoop) wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Phillip J. Eby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2008 4:31 PM
> To: Garrett Cooper (garrcoop); distutils-sig@python.org
> Subject: Re: [Distutils] Potential issue with multiple
> -Original Message-
> From: Phillip J. Eby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2008 4:31 PM
> To: Garrett Cooper (garrcoop); distutils-sig@python.org
> Subject: Re: [Distutils] Potential issue with multiple
> easy_install instances and single easy_install.pth
>
> At 07
At 07:14 PM 10/18/2008 -0700, Garrett Cooper (garrcoop) wrote:
Hi Python folks,
As part of a build system I work with, my group installs
multiple Python packages via source using easy_install. One such issue
I've seen before in the past is that when using multiple easy_install
instances (
At 10:32 AM 10/17/2008 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
So I have a question for all the developers on this list. Philip thinks
that using symlinks will drive adoption better than an API to access
package data. I think an API will have better adoption than a symlink
hack. But the real question is
