[Distutils] Addendum SOLVED: bdist_rpm and pre-release python packages / eggs (was: pre-release versioning problems with sdist, bdist_rpm, bdist_debian)

Hello, guys, The mail I sent earlier had a patch which seems to depend upon a RHEL- distributed patch which I am now attaching (along with the original patch too). I have logged bugs in the pertinent bug trackers. -- Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) Rudd-O.com - http://rudd-o.com/

[Distutils] SOLVED: bdist_rpm and pre-release python packages / eggs (was: pre-release versioning problems with sdist, bdist_rpm, bdist_debian)

Hello, guys, I have fixed distutils (and setuptools remains working) with the attached patch. Now, RPMs will be built according to the Fedora Package Naming Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Non- Numeric_Version_in_Release which I understand to be the most u

Re: [Distutils] data in a source distribution?

At 10:13 PM 3/10/2009 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: Hi, Is it possible to include data in a source distribution? You need to specify the data files in your MANIFEST.in file -- the distutils don't do that automatically for you. Of course, if you use setuptools to create your sdist, and

Re: [Distutils] Running tests for zc.recipe.cmmi?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: > On Mar 4, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> I was trying to update the package to get rid of a deprecation warning >> under Python 2.6. >> >> $ svn co $ZSVN/zc.recipe.c

Re: [Distutils] Packages listed in Easy-Install.pth

Thanks you PJ that is most helpful. Seems to be the answer I was looking for. :-) On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 02:17:07 -0400, "P.J. Eby" wrote: > At 11:19 PM 3/9/2009 -0400, David Lyon wrote: > >>What I want to do is use these in a list of installed packages. And then >>later provide for deinstall

[Distutils] data in a source distribution?

Hi, Is it possible to include data in a source distribution? I'd like to avoid eggs, since they don't integrate well with Gentoo packages, but I didn't find a way to include data in a source distribution (python setup.py sdist). Did I miss something? Best wishes, Arne -- -- Ein Würfel S

Re: [Distutils] patch: solving the two major things that people dislike about setuptools, part 1

zooko wrote: What's the status of Mark Sienkiewicz's patch to solve the most widely-hated feature of setuptools (that it disrespects the order of your PYTHONPATH) while also satisfying PJE's requirements for precedence of egg importing? It would make certain things easier if I could install s

Re: [Distutils] Running tests for zc.recipe.cmmi?

On Mar 4, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I was trying to update the package to get rid of a deprecation warning under Python 2.6. $ svn co $ZSVN/zc.recipe.cmmi/trunk cmmi-trunk $ cd cmmi-trunk $ /path/to/bin/python2.6 bootstrap/bootstrap.py

Re: [Distutils] patch: solving the two major things that people dislike about setuptools, part 1

What's the status of Mark Sienkiewicz's patch to solve the most widely-hated feature of setuptools (that it disrespects the order of your PYTHONPATH) while also satisfying PJE's requirements for precedence of egg importing? http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2009-January/010768.

Re: [Distutils] [zc.buildout] buildout to .deb package

By the way, stdeb builds .deb files from distutils-packaged Python source distributions as well as from setuptools-packaged Python source distributions. Regards, Zooko ___ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/m

Re: [Distutils] Python Packaging Survey -- question 8 not well-formulated

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Stephen Waterbury wrote: > (And now for a comment that's not about the site certificate!  >:) > > Question 8 provides 5 options, none of which apply to me, and no > option to comment without choosing one. > > Question 7 does the right thing by providing an option t