David Lyon wrote:
>> You need to detect cython (configuration stage)
>>
>
> cython is a type of python interpretor? like jython or ironpython
>
Cython is a language which is more or less a subset of python, with
optional typing, and cython is the name of the Cython -> C compiler. It
is one
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:22:20 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
> The problem is a bit more complicated, because it cannot be handled in
> one single section.
I really appreciate you sharing this challenge with me.
I'm really convinced that I can "tweak" something to make it work. And
now is a reall
David Lyon wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:48:00 +0900, David Cournapeau
> wrote:
>
>> Let's take a common case: using cython/pyrex to accelerate some code,
>> but you still want people to be able to use your package without a C
>> compiler (bzr, cython are examples of such packages).
>>
>
I really love this stuff..
It's better than soap opera..
We have jerks, interjectors, behind the scenes plots, secret messages,
moles and flashbacks..
I'm staying tuned in and hope tomorow's episode will be just as thrilling
as todays..
> At 02:38 PM 10/15/2009 -0400, sstein...@gmail.com wrote
Warning: 3 part message.
It's all related so I decided to bundle it rather than starting
several new threads on the already over-burdened distutils list.
On Oct 15, 2009, at 5:06 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Now, ssteinerX, what do you mean exactly by shared foundation ?
Well, at the moment, se
And virtualenv-distribute was updated at the same time too.
Reinout van Rees a écrit :
> Tarek is off to bed, so I'll throw out a quick mail to bring you all the happy
> tiding that distribute 0.6.6 is out! So get ready for your
> "easy_install -U distribute".
>
> Buildout users can grab http:/
Tarek is off to bed, so I'll throw out a quick mail to bring you all the happy
tiding that distribute 0.6.6 is out! So get ready for your
"easy_install -U distribute".
Buildout users can grab http://python-distribute.org/bootstrap.py and get
their bin/buildout to use this stable 0.6.6. Works li
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Michael Schurter
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, sstein...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:55 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>>
>> [a whole bunch of stuff...]
>>
>> Understood and I've observed the public portions of all of this. Much of it
>> has not
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, sstein...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:55 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>
> [a whole bunch of stuff...]
>
> Understood and I've observed the public portions of all of this. Much of it
> has not been pretty.
>
> Personality conflicts aside, I wonder if it would b
On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:55 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
[a whole bunch of stuff...]
Understood and I've observed the public portions of all of this. Much
of it has not been pretty.
Personality conflicts aside, I wonder if it would be possible to move
some portion of the base of both setuptools and D
At 02:38 PM 10/15/2009 -0400, sstein...@gmail.com wrote:
that there are other people on the Distribute team who I'd
seriously consider as committers on setuptools or even as a chief
maintainer of the setuptools 0.6 line (if not more).
...asked me who those team members are
I'm asking. Who are
On 2009-10-15, John Gabriele wrote:
> Was just looking at the Distribute docs at
> http://packages.python.org/distribute/index.html (nicely styled, btw).
> Are there any other projects at http://packages.python.org/ (note,
> that page actually doesn't even load)? What is the purpose of
> packages.
Was just looking at the Distribute docs at
http://packages.python.org/distribute/index.html (nicely styled, btw).
Are there any other projects at http://packages.python.org/ (note,
that page actually doesn't even load)? What is the purpose of
packages.python.org , and how does one get their project
that there are other people on the Distribute team who I'd
seriously consider as committers on setuptools or even as a chief
maintainer of the setuptools 0.6 line (if not more).
...asked me who those team members are
I'm asking. Who are they and, if you are willing to give them access,
h
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:50 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>
> So, good luck with that, 'cause I'm done with it.
I am sorry we were unable to understand each other. I proposed you to
join because I felt it was the right thing to do. But that doesn't
matter at this point. We'll just work on our side.
Good
At 02:32 PM 10/15/2009 +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
That would make us happy, because we would be able to work and
continue if you are not available sometimes without the feeling
that we are locked, and that would give you the manpower you miss to
develop some of your idea.
So... you've explained
Andreas Klöckner kirjoitti:
On Donnerstag 15 Oktober 2009, Andreas Klöckner wrote:
Hi there,
I've recently tried distribute, and much to my dismay found that it doesn't
appear to contain an equivalent of "setup.py develop". Is such a thing
planned, or, even better, available now?
Ah,
On Donnerstag 15 Oktober 2009, Andreas Klöckner wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've recently tried distribute, and much to my dismay found that it doesn't
> appear to contain an equivalent of "setup.py develop". Is such a thing
> planned, or, even better, available now?
Ah, never mind. I had screwed up m
Andreas Klöckner kirjoitti:
Hi there,
I've recently tried distribute, and much to my dismay found that it doesn't
appear to contain an equivalent of "setup.py develop". Is such a thing
planned, or, even better, available now?
You must be mistaken. Distribute definitely has such a command
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:48:00 +0900, David Cournapeau
wrote:
> Let's take a common case: using cython/pyrex to accelerate some code,
> but you still want people to be able to use your package without a C
> compiler (bzr, cython are examples of such packages).
I believe that's possible through the
Hi there,
I've recently tried distribute, and much to my dismay found that it doesn't
appear to contain an equivalent of "setup.py develop". Is such a thing
planned, or, even better, available now?
Thanks,
Andreas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>
> And if you agree, and want the project name,
... to be changed...
> we can all find a neutral name that everybody would like.
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.p
Phillip,
I have a proposal for Distribute 0.7 : let's join forces and all work
together in that tool.
"All" would be the commiters of Distribute, and PJE. These people
would all be in the same team with the same commiter rights,
and I propose that you become the leader of that tool and guide us i
On 2009-10-15, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>
> buildouters, if you want to try the latest dev version you can grab :
> http://python-distribute.org/bootstrap_dev.py
To make it explicit: grabbing this bootstrap and using it is safe for every
project. And it is the only change you need to make!
- No need
Hey,
Reinout and I have worked on bugs related to zc.buildout support, and
it seems that now everything works fine.
Thanks for those who try it on their side !
So we will be shipping a 0.6.5 probably friday for that, and postpone
all the other issues for 0.6.6, except a few ones that are easy to
25 matches
Mail list logo
