FIY (I didn't cross-post to make it easier for following the threads)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tarek Ziadé
Date: Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:44 PM
Subject: The fate of Distutils in Python 2.7
To: Python-Dev
Hello,
This is a follow-up of the Pycon summit + sprints on packagin
At 02:27 PM 2/26/2010 -0500, Olemis Lang wrote:
test_suite is ( supported | introduced | defined ) by
setuptools.comand.test.test class
> Is it required to be a
> callable
yep
No. test_suite is to be an object recognized by the test_loader as
convertible to a unittest TestSuite. For exampl
At 11:19 AM 2/26/2010 -0500, Olemis Lang wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:52 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
> At 10:16 AM 2/26/2010 -0500, Olemis Lang wrote:
>>
>> Well not as happily as I thought in first place. The fact is that
>> `setuptools` test command creates the runner by calling the class
>> spec
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:52 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
> At 10:16 AM 2/26/2010 -0500, Olemis Lang wrote:
>>
>> Well not as happily as I thought in first place. The fact is that
>> `setuptools` test command creates the runner by calling the class
>> specified in `test_runner` arg but supplies no paramet
At 10:16 AM 2/26/2010 -0500, Olemis Lang wrote:
Well not as happily as I thought in first place. The fact is that
`setuptools` test command creates the runner by calling the class
specified in `test_runner` arg but supplies no parameters. In this
case I'd like to specify `xmlrunner:XMLTestRunner`
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Olemis Lang wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:29 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>> At 12:10 PM 2/25/2010 -0500, Olemis Lang wrote:
>>>
>>> Thnx for your reply !
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:00 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>>> > At 10:41 AM 2/25/2010 -0500, Olemis Lang wrote
Hi,
In my quest to make re-usable buildout components, I've started using a
pattern like this:
In a server-specific buildout file (e.g. prod-web-master.cfg) I have e.g.:
[buildout]
extends =
buildout.d/base.cfg
buildout.d/zope.cfg
buildout.d/relstorage.cfg
buildout.d/haproxy.c
