Re: [Distutils] RECORD format in PEP 376

2010-03-30 Thread Tarek Ziadé
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Sridhar Ratnakumar wrote: > > On 2010-03-30, at 2:06 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'd like to make the RECORD file dead simple for PEP 376, and remove >>> all the relocatable work we've started

Re: [Distutils] RECORD format in PEP 376

2010-03-30 Thread Sridhar Ratnakumar
On 2010-03-30, at 2:06 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to make the RECORD file dead simple for PEP 376, and remove >> all the relocatable work we've started in it, since it'll go in a >> second >> file. This would be done in

Re: [Distutils] zc.buildout: bootstrap.py script

2010-03-30 Thread Tarek Ziadé
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:08 AM, René Fleschenberg wrote: > Hi, > > The code in bootstrap.py doesn't use the if __name__ == "__main__" idiom. > This can lead to funny behaviour if it is imported for some reason (I > stumbled upon this in conjunction with nose). > > Is there a reason for not check

[Distutils] zc.buildout: bootstrap.py script

2010-03-30 Thread René Fleschenberg
Hi, The code in bootstrap.py doesn't use the if __name__ == "__main__" idiom. This can lead to funny behaviour if it is imported for some reason (I stumbled upon this in conjunction with nose). Is there a reason for not checking for __name__ == "__main__", or should this be changed? -- René

Re: [Distutils] RECORD format in PEP 376

2010-03-30 Thread Tarek Ziadé
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to make the RECORD file dead simple for PEP 376, and remove > all the relocatable work we've started in it, since it'll go in a > second > file. This would be done in a second phase, with the work done at Pycon. Ok, Iv'e d

Re: [Distutils] A PyPi question

2010-03-30 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> I am not sure if this is the correct mailinglist to address my question > to but it was the closest thing I could find (I see a few names from the > PyPi-commits mailing list in the archives here). If this is not the > correct place please let me know so I can post my question to the > correct m

Re: [Distutils] A PyPi question

2010-03-30 Thread Simon de Vlieger
Tarek, Thanks for the pointer. I will post my question there. Regards, Simon de Vlieger On 30 mrt 2010, at 16:09, Tarek Ziadé wrote: Hi Simon, The right list is the Catalog-SIG Regards, Tarek ___ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.

Re: [Distutils] A PyPi question

2010-03-30 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Hi Simon, The right list is the Catalog-SIG Regards, Tarek ___ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

[Distutils] A PyPi question

2010-03-30 Thread Simon de Vlieger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear all, I am not sure if this is the correct mailinglist to address my question to but it was the closest thing I could find (I see a few names from the PyPi-commits mailing list in the archives here). If this is not the correct place please

Re: [Distutils] PEP 376 Status

2010-03-30 Thread David Cournapeau
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Tres Seaver wrote: > It seems to me that sdists and binary dists need to be introspectable in > the same way that and installed and "develop" dists are.  Shouldn't the > information needed to generate the RECORD file be present in the sdist > somehow?  E.g., the C

Re: [Distutils] PEP 376 Status

2010-03-30 Thread David Cournapeau
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:37 AM, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: > This work calls for a systemwide sysconfig.cfg file which maps the > categories onto system locations.  I notice the example one contains > sections for "posix" and "posix_home" (among others), presumably the > "posix_home" one is for wh