On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
> Hello
>
> [David]
>> Distribute broke basic features of easy_install, which makes it
>> useless for my case (see for example #142).
> Is that http://bitbucket.org/tarek/distribute/issue/142 ?
> IIUC, distribute wanted to be a superset of setupto
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:12 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
[..]
> Hm, that's a bit different from my understanding,
> but that's a bit
> irresponsible of Ubuntu to provide distribute if it does not get at
> least the bug fixes which go into setuptools.
> Maybe there is a
> miscommunication here, dunn
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
[..]
>
> So as I told you many time, if you want to help, add an issue in the tracker,
> or help us fixing this bug by providing a patch :)
I am sorry about this, I didn't see that you did provide a patch for #142.
I am lacking of time at this
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> [..]
>>
>> So as I told you many time, if you want to help, add an issue in the tracker,
>> or help us fixing this bug by providing a patch :)
>
> I am sorry about this, I didn't see that yo
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:56 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> [..]
>>>
>>> So as I told you many time, if you want to help, add an issue in the
>>> tracker,
>>> or help us fixing this bug b
Hello
If nobody can answer you here, you can ask on
debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Regards
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
At 09:45 AM 7/1/2010 +0530, Zubin Mithra wrote:
1. Setuptools is no longer being maintained.
This is not true. Please don't spread it, and I'd appreciate it if
you'd kindly issue a retraction in any other forum where you've
spread it. Thanks.
__
At 11:35 AM 7/1/2010 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:23 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
> Have you tried requesting an exact version number of setuptools? (e.g.
> setuptools==0.6c11 or setuptools==dev06)
I have tried that, but easy_install considers it does not need it
because dist
On Jul 01, 2010, at 11:10 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>Ubuntu Lucid uses distribute instead of setuptools, and I cannot
>manage to use setuptools with virtualenv because of this. I upgraded
>to the last version of virtualenv, which claims to install setuptools
>by default, but I still get distribu
On Jul 01, 2010, at 04:12 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>Hm, that's a bit different from my understanding, but that's a bit
>irresponsible of Ubuntu to provide distribute if it does not get at
>least the bug fixes which go into setuptools. Maybe there is a
>miscommunication here, dunno. I thought th
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:47 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
> At 09:45 AM 7/1/2010 +0530, Zubin Mithra wrote:
>
>> 1. Setuptools is no longer being maintained.
>>
>
> This is not true. Please don't spread it, and I'd appreciate it if you'd
> kindly issue a retraction in any other forum where you've
On 06/30/2010 11:48 PM, lukshun...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm using stdeb in debian/sid and the control file it generates
> defaults to build-depends on python-all-dev. What should I do to make
> it (build-)depend on python-dev? I've tried the --xs-python-version
> option but I got python-all-dev all t
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:18 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>
> Did you try asking for an *exact* version of setuptools with '==' (not using
> '>=' or leaving off a version)?
Yes. The exact command I have tried is
easy_install setuptools==0.6c11
David
___
Distu
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:12 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> [..]
>> Hm, that's a bit different from my understanding,
>> but that's a bit
>> irresponsible of Ubuntu to provide distribute if it does not get at
>> least the bug fixes which go into
At 09:00 PM 7/1/2010 +0530, Zubin Mithra wrote:
My sincere apologies.
I was under the impression that it was not being maintained. It'd be
great if you could point me towards the main setuptools trunk.
There's a link on the PyPI project page, as well as a link to the 0.6
stable branch. There
At 12:37 AM 7/2/2010 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:18 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>
> Did you try asking for an *exact* version of setuptools with '=='
(not using
> '>=' or leaving off a version)?
Yes. The exact command I have tried is
easy_install setuptools==0.6c11
Ou
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jul 01, 2010, at 04:12 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>>Hm, that's a bit different from my understanding, but that's a bit
>>irresponsible of Ubuntu to provide distribute if it does not get at
>>least the bug fixes which go into setuptools.
> (And this is the right place to ask questions about stdeb.)
I’m sorry, I read the message too fast. stdeb does belong on this list,
I hope I didn’t sound unfriendly when I made my hasty suggestion. Thanks
Andrew.
Regards
___
Distutils-SIG maillist -
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
> At 10:50 AM 7/1/2010 +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>
>> It's precisely because Ubuntu is a good distribution that they decided
>> to switch to distribute to get the most active project in it.
>
> Really? I would've thought that the most *stable* vers
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Zubin Mithra wrote:
> Hello,
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:47 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>>
>> At 09:45 AM 7/1/2010 +0530, Zubin Mithra wrote:
>>>
>>> 1. Setuptools is no longer being maintained.
>>
>> This is not true. Please don't spread it, and I'd appreciate it if you'd
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:47 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
[..]
> Thanks. Not only is it not true that it's not maintained, but it's actually
> actively developed (albeit at a glacial pace).
>
> The most recent commits to the trunk this year are in relation to new
> features in progress for 0.7; I just don'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>> At 10:50 AM 7/1/2010 +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>> It's precisely because Ubuntu is a good distribution that they decided
>>> to switch to distribute to get the most active projec
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>>> At 10:50 AM 7/1/2010 +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
It's precisely because Ubuntu is a good distribution that they dec
On Jul 02, 2010, at 12:53 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Jul 01, 2010, at 04:12 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>>
>>>Hm, that's a bit different from my understanding, but that's a bit
>>>irresponsible of Ubuntu to provide distribute if it does
At 12:53 AM 7/2/2010 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
This is issue 142 on bitbucket (distribute fork on Tarek account), and
there was a similar bug on setuptools issue tracker (submitted by
Zooko as well), but cannot find it ATM.
http://bugs.python.org/setuptools/issue17
A fix was released in s
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>
> It prefers newer packages, or, if the versions are the same, it prefers the
> shortest download URL. In this case, the Google Code url is shorter.
That's illogical. Better prefer PyPI if versions are the same.
>> Is it possible to raise the
At 11:36 PM 7/1/2010 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>
> It prefers newer packages, or, if the versions are the same, it
prefers the shortest download URL. Â In this case, the Google Code
url is shorter.
That's illogical. Better prefer PyPI if
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:10 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>> >
>> > It prefers newer packages, or, if the versions are the same, it prefers
>> > the shortest download URL. Â In this case, the Google Code url is shorter.
>>
>> That's illogical. Better prefer PyPI if versions are the same.
>
> The "shortest
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jul 02, 2010, at 12:53 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> On Jul 01, 2010, at 04:12 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>>>
Hm, that's a bit different from my understanding, but that's a bit
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>> At 10:50 AM 7/1/2010 +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>>
>>> It's precisely because Ubuntu is a good distribution that they decided
>>> to switch to distribute to get the most active project in it.
>
At 01:33 AM 7/2/2010 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:10 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
>> >
>> > It prefers newer packages, or, if the versions are the same, it prefers
>> > the shortest download URL. Ã In this case, the Google Code
url is shorter.
>>
>> That's illogical. Bette
31 matches
Mail list logo
