On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Daniel Holth wrote:
> It is because the file has a controversial coding style, with up to 25
> lines of whitespace between classes, and includes functionality for
> eggs and some other stuff that was unwanted on top of the resources
> stuff that partly made its way
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2012, at 03:40 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 15:33 -0400, Daniel Holth wrote:
>>> It is because the file has a controversial coding style, with up to 25
>>> lines of whitespace between classes, and includes f
On Sep 16, 2012, at 03:40 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
>On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 15:33 -0400, Daniel Holth wrote:
>> It is because the file has a controversial coding style, with up to 25
>> lines of whitespace between classes, and includes functionality for
>> eggs and some other stuff that was unwant
On Sep 16, 2012, at 03:33 PM, Daniel Holth wrote:
>It is because the file has a controversial coding style, with up to 25
>lines of whitespace between classes, and includes functionality for
>eggs and some other stuff that was unwanted on top of the resources
>stuff that partly made its way into p
It part of 3.3 for awhile, but it was ultimately removed because it was
determined that it was not ready for inclusion in the stdlib.
On Monday, September 17, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Almar Klein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm eagerly looking forward to the improvements that distutils2/packaging
> will (hopef
Hi,
I'm eagerly looking forward to the improvements that distutils2/packaging
will (hopefully) bring, and I very much appreciate the efforts of those
involved.
However, I'm a bit confused about the status. On
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Distutils2 it says packaging is included in
Python 3.3, and
