Hi Nick,
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:56 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 12:44 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
> >> On Monday, March 4, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> >
> >> > If parallel incompatible installs is a
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:56 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Mark McLoughlin > (mailto:mar...@redhat.com)> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 12:44 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
> > > > On Mond
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 07:34 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:56 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
...
> > > I will note that making this kind of idea more feasible is one of
> > > the
> > > reasons I am making "compat
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > I still don't really see how this is related to PEP426 unless PEP426
> > has gotten
> > a lot larger since I last looked at it. Where in particular a
> > distribution gets
> > installed is left up to the installers to sort out. And ma
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>> If Python library maintainers will see PEP426 as a license to make
>> incompatible changes more often so long as they bump their major number,
>> then that perception will change
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> I still don't really see how this is related to PEP426 unless PEP426
> has gotten
> a lot larger since I last looked at it. Where in particular a
> distribution gets
> installed
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 07:34 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
>> > On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:56 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> ...
>> > > I will note that making this kind of idea mo
What I'm doing is checking out distribute, then trying to install it
into a temporary directory. However, when I do this, I seem to be
getting the files in python 2 form, *not* having been converted using
2to3. The resulting build is therefore broken.
Can anyone suggest what might be going on here
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Ok, there's a tonne of details there about pip, virtualenv and .pth
> files that are going over my head right now, but the general idea I'm
> taking away is:
>
> - the system has multiple versions of somedep installed under /usr
> som
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Daniel Holth wrote:
> You will be amazed at how much backwards compatible cruft some
> developers will keep around rather than endure the psychological
> anguish of bumping the major version number.
We also have Python 3 to hit them over the head with. "Look how m
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 4 March 2013 20:00, Daniel Holth wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> In thinking about how virtualenv would describe the packages it wants
>>> to preload in PEP 426 metadata form, it occurred to me that there are
On 6 Mar 2013 00:59, "PJ Eby" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On 4 March 2013 20:00, Daniel Holth wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>> In thinking about how virtualenv would describe the packages it wants
> >>> to preload in PEP 42
12 matches
Mail list logo
