On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:30 PM, David Wilson wrote:
>> Prototype code is here: https://bitbucket.org/dmw/pypi-search (note:
>> relies on a pre-alpha quality DB library I'm hacking on)
>>
>> Thoughts?
Hi David,
This certainly sounds intriguing (and even promising), but I believe
Richard (Jones,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> I've made progress in my experiment to replace pkg_resources usage in pip
> with code in distlib. The basic approach is to replace references to
> pkg_resources with references to pip.vendor.distlib.pkg_resources, where the
> latter module is a
On Apr 22, 2013, at 7:38 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Note that the pip.vendor.distlib version is slightly different to the
> released distlib - the main difference being that the metadata version in the
> released distlib is treated as 2.0, whereas for pip I had to change it to
> 1.3.
This part wor
On 23 April 2013 17:03, Donald Stufft wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2013, at 7:38 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
> > Note that the pip.vendor.distlib version is slightly different to the
> > released distlib - the main difference being that the metadata version
> in the
> > released distlib is treated as 2.0, w
On 23/04/2013 03:20, Marcus Smith wrote:
fyi, there is dev list now for the "pypa" family of projects (most
notably pip and virtualenv)
"
"pypa-dev" https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/pypa-dev
This is *not* meant to replace distutils-sig.
It's for more "day-to-day" discussions
It's still the user list for now.
> What's happening with
> python-virtualenv@**googlegroups.com
> ?
>
>
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
Donald Stufft stufft.io> writes:
> > released distlib is treated as 2.0, whereas for pip I had to change it to
> > 1.3.
>
> This part worries me. I don't think should maintain any patches for things
inside of pip.vendor.
Well, the pip test data includes some distributions which include the
pos
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Donald Stufft stufft.io> writes:
>
>
>> > released distlib is treated as 2.0, whereas for pip I had to change it to
>> > 1.3.
>>
>> This part worries me. I don't think should maintain any patches for things
> inside of pip.vendor.
>
> Well, th