Re: [Distutils] Updated drafts of metadata 2.0 (PEP 426 and PEP 440)

2013-06-20 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 21 Jun 2013 07:40, "Paul Moore" wrote: > > On 20 June 2013 21:54, Daniel Holth wrote: >> >> These metadata PEPs are >> mostly about the installer, database of installed files, and package >> indexes. > > > In essence (and I freely admit I don't fully understand the details yet myself) I think

Re: [Distutils] Updated drafts of metadata 2.0 (PEP 426 and PEP 440)

2013-06-20 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 21 Jun 2013 06:19, "holger krekel" wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 01:05 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > On 21 Jun 2013 00:36, "holger krekel" wrote: > > > > > > > > > I still think the testing part of "the interchange format > > > between software publication and integration tools" is under

Re: [Distutils] Updated drafts of metadata 2.0 (PEP 426 and PEP 440)

2013-06-20 Thread Donald Stufft
On Jun 20, 2013, at 5:40 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On 20 June 2013 21:54, Daniel Holth wrote: > These metadata PEPs are > mostly about the installer, database of installed files, and package > indexes. > > In essence (and I freely admit I don't fully understand the details yet > myself) I think

Re: [Distutils] Updated drafts of metadata 2.0 (PEP 426 and PEP 440)

2013-06-20 Thread Paul Moore
On 20 June 2013 21:54, Daniel Holth wrote: > These metadata PEPs are > mostly about the installer, database of installed files, and package > indexes. > In essence (and I freely admit I don't fully understand the details yet myself) I think the idea is that PEPs 426 and 440 define a set of data

Re: [Distutils] Updated drafts of metadata 2.0 (PEP 426 and PEP 440)

2013-06-20 Thread Daniel Holth
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, holger krekel wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 01:05 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> On 21 Jun 2013 00:36, "holger krekel" wrote: >> > >> > >> > I still think the testing part of "the interchange format >> > between software publication and integration tools" is und

Re: [Distutils] Updated drafts of metadata 2.0 (PEP 426 and PEP 440)

2013-06-20 Thread holger krekel
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 01:05 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 21 Jun 2013 00:36, "holger krekel" wrote: > > > > > > I still think the testing part of "the interchange format > > between software publication and integration tools" is underspecified. > > The dependencies alone will not be sufficient

Re: [Distutils] Heads up: I plan to release buildout 2.2.0 this weekend.

2013-06-20 Thread Sebastien Douche
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: > Testing has gone well, but I still anticipate a little excitement. Yeah. Maybe a good idea to wait Setuptools 0.8? -- Sebastien Douche Twitter: @sdouche / G+: +sdouche ___ Distutils-SIG maillist -

Re: [Distutils] Heads up: I plan to release buildout 2.2.0 this weekend.

2013-06-20 Thread Jim Fulton
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Sebastien Douche wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: >> Testing has gone well, but I still anticipate a little excitement. > > Yeah. Maybe a good idea to wait Setuptools 0.8? Why? It will pick up setuptools.8 when it becomes available.

Re: [Distutils] Updated drafts of metadata 2.0 (PEP 426 and PEP 440)

2013-06-20 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 21 Jun 2013 00:36, "holger krekel" wrote: > > > I still think the testing part of "the interchange format > between software publication and integration tools" is underspecified. > The dependencies alone will not be sufficient to allow the running > of tests in many cases. Or am i missing some

[Distutils] Heads up: I plan to release buildout 2.2.0 this weekend.

2013-06-20 Thread Jim Fulton
Testing has gone well, but I still anticipate a little excitement. Jim -- Jim Fulton http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton ___ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Re: [Distutils] Updated drafts of metadata 2.0 (PEP 426 and PEP 440)

2013-06-20 Thread holger krekel
I still think the testing part of "the interchange format between software publication and integration tools" is underspecified. The dependencies alone will not be sufficient to allow the running of tests in many cases. Or am i missing something? best and thanks for your good work, holger On

Re: [Distutils] Updated drafts of metadata 2.0 (PEP 426 and PEP 440)

2013-06-20 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 20 June 2013 23:36, Daniel Holth wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> The only major remaining open item is the addition of guidelines in >> Appendix A for converting legacy metadata to metadata 2.0. I consider >> the rest of the spec stable at this point, unless an

Re: [Distutils] Updated drafts of metadata 2.0 (PEP 426 and PEP 440)

2013-06-20 Thread Daniel Holth
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > New versions of PEP 426 and PEP 440 are up on python.org: > > PEP 426 (metadata 2.0): http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0426/ > PEP 440 (version spec): http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/ > > (as before, not including them inline due to

[Distutils] Updated drafts of metadata 2.0 (PEP 426 and PEP 440)

2013-06-20 Thread Nick Coghlan
New versions of PEP 426 and PEP 440 are up on python.org: PEP 426 (metadata 2.0): http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0426/ PEP 440 (version spec): http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/ (as before, not including them inline due to sheer length) The bulk of the changes are in this commit: http:

Re: [Distutils] Buildout 2.2.0b1 is available fort testing

2013-06-20 Thread Brian Sutherland
I've been using this the last few days under python 2.7 and virtualenv 1.9.1. No problems whatsoever, apart from having to upgrade setuptools before running the buildout's bootstrap. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 08:44:30AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: > Changes: > > - Switch dependency from ``distribute