Vinay brought to my attention that bdist_wheel currently publishes
pydist.json files that claim to contain content in the metadata 2.0
format. I was aware that Daniel had been experimenting with generating
pydist.json files, but I didn't realise that bdist_wheel did it by
default, nor that it used
I finally started working on the docs.python.org updates for PEP 453
tonight, and I'm just not seeing much salvageable information in
http://docs.python.org/3/install/index.html.
While it was a big step forward back in 1998, it seems to me that it
has simply been left unmaintained for too long,
On 23 February 2014 11:43, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
With that content gone from the end user installation guide in 3.4+,
it can become just a very, very simple introduction to the core pip
commands, and then a reference out to the packaging user guide for
more info.
Thoughts?
On 23 February 2014 22:00, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 February 2014 11:43, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
With that content gone from the end user installation guide in 3.4+,
it can become just a very, very simple introduction to the core pip
commands, and then a
Getting this right now on all pypi pages
Error 503 backend read error
backend read error
Guru Meditation:
XID: 1718559534
Varnish cache server
http://status.python.org/ is silent.
Something is wrong with monitoring.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:40 PM,
Hi!
I found thread titled Handling the binary dependency management problem
at
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2013-December/023145.html
and was trying to find it using Google Groups interface using this search
However, after thinking a little more on the challenge, I believe the
lower level legacy content should fit right in as a new subsection in
the distutils docs at http://docs.python.org/3/distutils/index.html.
There's 3 things right now:
1. http://docs.python.org/3/distutils/index.html
1. http://docs.python.org/3/distutils/index.html(Installing Python
Modules)
2. http://docs.python.org/3/install/index.html (Distributing Python
Modules)
woops, I reversed the links for these.
___
Distutils-SIG maillist -
On 24 Feb 2014 07:48, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
However, after thinking a little more on the challenge, I believe the
lower level legacy content should fit right in as a new subsection in
the distutils docs at http://docs.python.org/3/distutils/index.html.
There's 3 things right
I'm willing to work on a patch for this, if you agree.
I do like the idea of moving most of the distutils docs into the distutils
module reference.
If you were willing to handle that task, that would be brilliant - I'd
then focus on writing *new* content
ok, I'll see what I can come up
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
However, after thinking a little more on the challenge, I believe the
lower level legacy content should fit right in as a new subsection in
the distutils docs at http://docs.python.org/3/distutils/index.html.
There's 3
I was thinking that #1 and #2 should disappear (or just provide a link to
the PUG).
I don't think you should bother to recreate any more guides in the
python.org docs.
The valuable reference content in #1 and #2 should be refactored into
#3.
To be explicit about one aspect of this
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, I noticed that PUG's Installation Packaging Tutorial
[1] is one section. Shouldn't those be separate tutorials? IIRC that
information was in separate sections before (one for installing and
one for
Yeah, that history still shows. The first section called Install the
Tools is only about installing the tools needed for installation.
Well, for packaging, minimally you'll need setuptools, and we recommend
using get-pip or pip to install setuptools.
And if you're going to work in develop
...well now this is very curious. My reply to you bounced, because I'm not
subscribed to the google group version... but somehow I got your message in
the first place??
Manually CC'ing this one to distutils-sig@python.org, because I don't think
anyone there is aware of the problem.
-matt
On
On 24 February 2014 07:06, Matt Wilkie map...@gmail.com wrote:
...well now this is very curious. My reply to you bounced, because I'm not
subscribed to the google group version... but somehow I got your message in
the first place??
That happens to me too - I think Google Groups messes with the
16 matches
Mail list logo
