On 20 March 2014 09:54, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Daniel Holth gmail.com> writes:
>
>> extensions without using distutils. The problem of invoking the
>> compiler has been solved by many build systems and is not just a
>> unique and mysterious distutils feature.
>
> Did someone say it was? Building ex
Daniel Holth gmail.com> writes:
> extensions without using distutils. The problem of invoking the
> compiler has been solved by many build systems and is not just a
> unique and mysterious distutils feature.
Did someone say it was? Building extensions is something distil does too, and
without u
The idea is not new. Here are some examples for SCons:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2627731/using-scons-as-a-build-engine-for-distutils
The answers may need to be updated, so if anybody comes
up with convenient distutils tool semantics - it can be
integrated into next SCons release.
On Wed,
One reason people use distutils is because it can compile Python
extension modules. Here's an example from waf that compiles Python
extensions without using distutils. The problem of invoking the
compiler has been solved by many build systems and is not just a
unique and mysterious distutils featur
I've released version 0.1.8 of distlib on PyPI [1]. For newcomers,
distlib is a library of packaging functionality which is intended
to be usable as the basis for third-party packaging tools.
The main changes in this release are as follows:
* Fixed issue #45: Improved thread-safety in SimpleScrap
