On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Piotr Dobrogost
p...@2015.forums.dobrogost.net wrote:
Hi
As an external observer of pip project at github I see two men, namely
Xavier Fernandez (https://github.com/xavfernandez) and Marc Abramowitz
(https://github.com/msabramo) with many valuable
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:17 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
Stealing some packaging code from Go and tweaking may not be that bad idea. =)
At least they use code review system to let new people learn and old
people share.
Yep and most of the people working on Go are paid to do
Has PyPA considered contacting GitHub support? I'm happy to do the
same since I've wanted this for a while myself on other projects.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 March 2015 at 23:01, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Tooling wise, Github PRs
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 Mar 2015 22:10, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com writes:
CPython uses the Reitveld instance integrated with bugs.python.org,
and has the same problem as pip: incremental
On Mar 6, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Ian Cordasco graffatcolmin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 Mar 2015 22:10, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com writes:
CPython uses the Reitveld
On 6 March 2015 at 03:16, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
So I guess my suggestions boil down to:
- Add more humans
- Add more money to make humans more efficient
- Add more computer automation
maybe agree to always maintain X open issues and Y open PRs, before
adding features.
On 6 March 2015 at 08:00, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io writes:
Sadly with how the code in pip is written, sometimes it’s just not
reasonable to make small PRs because things are not well factored and
changing things requires touching a lot of
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com writes:
CPython uses the Reitveld instance integrated with bugs.python.org,
and has the same problem as pip: incremental changes are a pain to
publish, review, and merge, so we review and accept monolithic patches
instead (cf the problem statement in
Anatoly,
We already ruled out AppVeyor
On Mar 6, 2015 2:11 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Ian Cordasco
graffatcolmin...@gmail.com wrote:
And for CI, we need people who will help with the windows CI solution
on more than one front clearly.
On Mar 6, 2015, at 8:55 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-03-06 21:37:31 +1000 (+1000), Nick Coghlan wrote:
[...]
I've never used Gerrit in the OpenStack context though, so I don't
know if Donald dislikes Gerrit in its own right, or just the way
OpenStack uses it.
[...]
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Stuart Axon
stua...@yahoo.com.dmarc.invalid wrote:
Hi,
In my project, I install a .pth file into site-packages, I use the
data_files... in Ubuntu this seems to work OK, but in a Windows VM the file
doesn't seem to be being installed:
setup(
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Ian Cordasco
graffatcolmin...@gmail.com wrote:
And for CI, we need people who will help with the windows CI solution
on more than one front clearly.
https://ci.appveyor.com/ works for open source projects.
--
anatoly t.
Stealing some packaging code from Go and tweaking may not be that bad idea. =)
At least they use code review system to let new people learn and old
people share.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Ian Cordasco graffatcolmin...@gmail.com wrote:
Wait, I have an idea. Let's rewrite pip in Rust! ;)
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Marc Abramowitz msabr...@gmail.com wrote:
- Add more computer automation
#3 seems most appealing to me, but of course it requires humans to develop
it in the first place, but at least it's an investment that could pay
dividends.
On page
Hi
As an external observer of pip project at github I see two men, namely
Xavier Fernandez (https://github.com/xavfernandez) and Marc Abramowitz
(https://github.com/msabramo) with many valuable contributions. I
think it would be beneficial if they had been granted some more
permissions to the
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 March 2015 at 16:38, Marc Abramowitz msabr...@gmail.com wrote:
This makes me think that the folks who review the PRs are overburdened
and/or the process needs a bit more structure (e.g.: each person thinks
someone else
Hi
As an external observer of pip project at github I see two men, namely
Xavier Fernandez (https://github.com/xavfernandez) and Marc Abramowitz
(https://github.com/msabramo) with many valuable contributions. I
think it would be beneficial if they had been granted some more
permissions to the
On 6 Mar 2015 22:10, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com writes:
CPython uses the Reitveld instance integrated with bugs.python.org,
and has the same problem as pip: incremental changes are a pain to
publish, review, and merge, so we review and
On 7 Mar 2015 05:41, Piotr Dobrogost p...@2015.forums.dobrogost.net wrote:
Hi
As an external observer of pip project at github I see two men, namely
Xavier Fernandez (https://github.com/xavfernandez) and Marc Abramowitz
(https://github.com/msabramo) with many valuable contributions. I
think
On 7 Mar 2015 06:44, Ian Cordasco graffatcolmin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem with discussing this sort of thing is that it's *very*
wide-ranging, and tends to produce huge rambling mega-threads[1] when
discussed in a
On Mar 6, 2015, at 6:56 AM, Piotr Dobrogost p...@2015.forums.dobrogost.net
wrote:
Hi
As an external observer of pip project at github I see two men, namely
Xavier Fernandez (https://github.com/xavfernandez) and Marc Abramowitz
(https://github.com/msabramo) with many valuable
21 matches
Mail list logo
