On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:05:45 -0400
Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/08/2015 07:10 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> > Seriously, how this is even supposed to be relevant? The whole point
> > is to produce best-effort packages that work on still-supported
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/08/2015 07:10 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Seriously, how this is even supposed to be relevant? The whole point
> is to produce best-effort packages that work on still-supported
> mainstream distros, not any arbitrary "Linux" setup.
I'm arguing
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 05:39:13 -0400
Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/07/2015 07:43 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> > That's a dramatically uninformed statement, to put it politely...
> > Some packages have difficult-to-meet build dependencies, and can a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2015 07:43 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> That's a dramatically uninformed statement, to put it politely...
> Some packages have difficult-to-meet build dependencies, and can also
> take a long time to do so.
In the general case, it is *exactly
