On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 14 August 2015 at 14:14, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
...
Of course if you have an alternative proposal than I'm all ears :-).
Yeah :)
So, I want to dedicate some time to contributing to this
On 14Aug2015 0038, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Windows and OS X don't (reliably) have any package manager. So PyPI
*is* inevitably going to contain non-Python shared libraries or
statically linked modules or something like that. (And in fact it
already contains such things today.) I'm not sure what
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Steve Dower steve.do...@python.org wrote:
I actually like two ideas for Windows (not clear to me how well they apply
on other platforms),
I think this same approach should be used for OS-X, not sure about Linux --
on LInux, you normally have normal ways to get
On 8/14/2015 16:16, Chris Barker wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Steve Dower steve.do...@python.org
mailto:steve.do...@python.org wrote:
There was discussion about an incompatible_with metadata item at
one point. Could numpy include {incompatible_with: scipyx.y} in
such a
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
(2) the special hard-coded tag centos5. (That's what everyone actually
uses in practice, right?)
Is LSB a fantasy that never happened? I haven't followed it for years
-CHB
Compare with osx, where there are actually a
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:52 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
So this is a basic list I got w/ a few minutes of scripting,
could we define this list (or somethign like it) as
Python-Linux-Standard-Base-version X.Y
Then we have a tag to use on binary wheels, and clearly defined
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 13 August 2015 at 12:51, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Aug 12, 2015 16:49, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
