Re: [Distutils] Brian Goetz - Stewardship: the Sobering Parts

First, do no harm, eh? (only 14 minutes into it so far) On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: > This was shown to me today, and I thought I’d share it here since it > pretty much applies 100% to what we’re doing on this list too (other than > the fact the

Re: [Distutils] Removing the aspirational aspects of PEP 426

On 29 October 2015 at 02:09, Robert Collins wrote: > On 28 October 2015 at 23:39, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Oct 28, 2015 3:25 AM, "Nick Coghlan" wrote: >>> >> [...] >>> From an sdist metadata perspective, though, I think the

Re: [Distutils] Please don't impose additional barriers to participation (was: build system abstraction PEP)

On Oct 29, 2015, at 10:52 PM, Marcus Smith wrote: >> If python-dev ends up adopting GitLab for the main PEPs repo, then we >> should be able to move the whole process there, rather than needing to >> maintain a separate copy. >> >will that be as open as pypa/interoperability-peps? if it's closed