Re: [Distutils] Serverside Dependency Resolution and Virtualenv Build Server

Am 11.11.2015 um 13:59 schrieb Donald Stufft: On November 11, 2015 at 1:30:57 AM, Thomas Güttler (guettl...@thomas-guettler.de) wrote: Maybe I am missing something, but still think server side dependency resolution is possible. I don’t believe it’s possible nor desirable to have the

Re: [Distutils] [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop supporting 'setup.py install'; start requiring 'pip install .' instead

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On 8 November 2015 at 17:42, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> I'm not sure exactly what's at stake in this terminological/ontological >> debate, but it certainly is fairly common for developers to have >>

Re: [Distutils] Serverside Dependency Resolution and Virtualenv Build Server

On Nov 12, 2015 6:32 AM, "Leonardo Rochael Almeida" wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > I think your idea could be very useful as an accelerator if installation in closed environments, as you suggested in your last e-mail, but which wasn't clear in your first. > > After all, in closed

[Distutils] Current PyPI storage requirements?

This isn't an urgent question, but rather a "if the stats are readily available, I'm curious as to the answer" one: what are PyPi's current storage requirements? The warehouse.python.org front page indicates how many objects there are, but not the amount of space they take up. Cheers, Nick. --

Re: [Distutils] The future of invoking pip

On 13 November 2015 at 03:08, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 at 04:06 Paul Moore wrote: >> >> On 11 November 2015 at 06:35, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> > Windows Python 2 installations require manual PATH modifications >> >

Re: [Distutils] The future of invoking pip

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote: > > If we waved our hands and were able to magically make Python package >> management perfect, what would that look like? > > well, I think the command would be: > > python install package_name > > I know

Re: [Distutils] The future of invoking pip

> If we waved our hands and were able to magically make Python package > management perfect, what would that look like? well, I think the command would be: python install package_name I know there are good reasons to keep package installer development out of core, but if have ensurepip-- we

Re: [Distutils] The future of invoking pip

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 at 04:06 Paul Moore wrote: > On 11 November 2015 at 06:35, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > Windows Python 2 installations require manual PATH modifications > > regardless, but it's more common for people to know how to make > > "python -m pip

Re: [Distutils] Serverside Dependency Resolution and Virtualenv Build Server

Am 12.11.2015 um 13:32 schrieb Leonardo Rochael Almeida: > Hi Thomas, > > I think your idea could be very useful as an accelerator if installation in > closed environments, as you suggested in your last e-mail, but which wasn't > clear in your first. > > After all, in closed environments you