Re: [Distutils] wheel 0.28.0 released

2016-02-06 Thread Nate Coraor
Hi Xavier, Thanks for the fix! I added a test to catch this in the future and uploaded 0.29.0 to PyPI. --nate On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Xavier Fernandez wrote: > Hello Nate, > > I think there is another regression with version 0.27: wheel files are not > zipped anymore. > > Cf https://b

Re: [Distutils] wheel 0.28.0 released

2016-02-06 Thread Xavier Fernandez
Hello Nate, I think there is another regression with version 0.27: wheel files are not zipped anymore. Cf https://bitbucket.org/pypa/wheel/issues/155 and https://bitbucket.org/pypa/wheel/pull-requests/62/ for a possible fix. So watch the size of your wheels with latest version :) Regards, Xavie

Re: [Distutils] [final version?] PEP 513 - A Platform Tag for Portable Linux Built Distributions

2016-02-06 Thread Donald Stufft
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 4:06 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 12:56:05PM -0500, Nate Coraor wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> >>> On Feb 5, 2016 9:35 AM, "Nate Coraor" wrote: Now that pip and wheel both support the Python 3 SOABI tags

Re: [Distutils] SOABI for Unicode ABI on 2.x (was: wheel 0.27.0 released)

2016-02-06 Thread Brian Cole
FWIW, we've seen a large shift in our userbase from UCS-2 to UCS-4 as Anaconda Python becomes the defacto Python2 interpreter in the sciences. We still ship both UCS-2 and UCS-4 as well. -Brian > On Feb 6, 2016, at 5:35 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 03:04:48PM +1000,

Re: [Distutils] Status update on the NumPy & SciPy vs SSE problem?

2016-02-06 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 6 February 2016 at 22:28, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > I'm not sure that's what you're implying, but the choice of a specific > BLAS or LAPACK implementation needn't (and shouldn't) be part of > manylinux, it's just a choice left to the packager. Bottom line is > that the BLAS/LAPACK implementation

Re: [Distutils] Status update on the NumPy & SciPy vs SSE problem?

2016-02-06 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 21:46:54 +1000 Nick Coghlan wrote: > > Thanks for the replies, folks! > > Checking I've understood the respective updates correctly: > > - x86_64 implies SSE2 capability > - most i686 machines still in use are also SSE2 capable > - Accelerate provides native BLAS/LAPACK APIs

Re: [Distutils] SOABI for Unicode ABI on 2.x (was: wheel 0.27.0 released)

2016-02-06 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 09:18:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 6 February 2016 at 20:35, Marius Gedminas wrote: > > FWIW the rationale Pyenv gave when they rejected a bug asking for UCS-4 > > builds by default was "we prefer to follow upstream defaults". > > In this case, the old defaults are

Re: [Distutils] SOABI for Unicode ABI on 2.x (was: wheel 0.27.0 released)

2016-02-06 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 6 February 2016 at 20:35, Marius Gedminas wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 03:04:48PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> That means the only folks that seem likely to miss out on pre-built >> binaries this way would be Python 2.7 pyenv users. > > And people who run build Python 2.7 with './configure

Re: [Distutils] SOABI for Unicode ABI on 2.x (was: wheel 0.27.0 released)

2016-02-06 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 03:04:48PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 6 February 2016 at 03:53, Nate Coraor wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> > >> On Feb 5, 2016 8:47 AM, "Nate Coraor" wrote: > >> > > >> [...] > >> > - Add SOABI tags to platform-specific wheels

Re: [Distutils] [final version?] PEP 513 - A Platform Tag for Portable Linux Built Distributions

2016-02-06 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 12:56:05PM -0500, Nate Coraor wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > > On Feb 5, 2016 9:35 AM, "Nate Coraor" wrote: > > > Now that pip and wheel both support the Python 3 SOABI tags on 2.X, is > > this necessary? The ABI tag should be set cor