Re: [Distutils] What's up with PyPi maintenance?

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Noah Kantrowitz wrote: > Just to make it explicit, if anyone wants to submit a patch with a cogent > explanation of what was wrong I'm sure it would get fixed ASAP. Good to know -- if issues aren't commented on, it's hard to know if a PR

Re: [Distutils] What's up with PyPi maintenance?

from the source, IIUC, warehouse wraps celery for Tasks: https://github.com/pypa/warehouse/blob/master/warehouse/celery.py route to view function mappings are in https://github.com/pypa/warehouse/blob/master/warehouse/routes.py packaging models are in

[Distutils] Wheels and Python implementation markers

What is the "correct" way to specify (for building wheels) in setup.py that a dependency should only be installed on CPython? If so, how should I go about it? Nothing I've tried seems to work right. The python_implementation marker worked up until packaging 16.5 and then

Re: [Distutils] What's up with PyPi maintenance?

> On Mar 18, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: > > >> On Mar 17, 2016, at 8:51 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal >> wrote: >> >> When do we expect that? A lot of people rely on the current system, we >> really need to find a way to maintain it

Re: [Distutils] What's up with PyPi maintenance?

On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 at 17:51 Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: > > b) Is there a serious lack of folks available to address such issues? >> > > This is the correct answer. I can't even keep on top of the request from > people wanting to take over packages. > > > if (b),