Re: [Distutils] cffi & Py_LIMITED_API

2016-07-31 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 1 August 2016 at 05:27, Daniel Holth wrote: > The next version of cffi will contain small changes to generate code > compliant with Python's Py_LIMITED_API: > https://bitbucket.org/cffi/cffi/commits/8f867f5a869f > > (although cffi itself is not, the extensions it generates

Re: [Distutils] Proposal: "Install and save"

2016-07-31 Thread Wes Turner
I've created a GitHub issue for this feature request: "pip install/upgrade --save" https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/3884 On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Wes Turner wrote: > On Jul 31, 2016 12:25 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: > > > > On 2016-07-30

Re: [Distutils] Proposal: "Install and save"

2016-07-31 Thread Wes Turner
On Jul 31, 2016 12:25 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: > > On 2016-07-30 20:23:14 -0500 (-0500), Wes Turner wrote: > > pbr also supports "environment markers" > > which we would want to preserve when round-tripping (reading in, modifying, > > and writing out) requirements.txt files;

[Distutils] cffi & Py_LIMITED_API

2016-07-31 Thread Daniel Holth
The next version of cffi will contain small changes to generate code compliant with Python's Py_LIMITED_API: https://bitbucket.org/cffi/cffi/commits/8f867f5a869f (although cffi itself is not, the extensions it generates will be). If we also add an appropriate supported tag to pip ~=

Re: [Distutils] Proposal: "Install and save"

2016-07-31 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-07-30 20:23:14 -0500 (-0500), Wes Turner wrote: > pbr also supports "environment markers" > which we would want to preserve when round-tripping (reading in, modifying, > and writing out) requirements.txt files; > though IDK if environment markers are part of any Python Packaging Spec? > >