On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 4 November 2016 at 03:56, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> But - it would be a huge help if the PSF could help with funding to
>> get mingw-w64 working. This is the crucial blocker for progress on
>> binary wheels on Windows.
>
> Such a grant was
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 4 November 2016 at 03:56, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> But - it would be a huge help if the PSF could help with funding to
>> get mingw-w64 working. This is the crucial blocker for progress on
>> binary wheels on Windows.
>
> Such a grant
On 4 November 2016 at 03:56, Matthew Brett wrote:
> But - it would be a huge help if the PSF could help with funding to
> get mingw-w64 working. This is the crucial blocker for progress on
> binary wheels on Windows.
Such a grant was already awarded earlier this year by way of the
Scientific Pyt
On 4 November 2016 at 06:07, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> I think we're drifting pretty far off topic here... IIRC the original
> discussion was about whether the travis-ci infrastructure could be suborned
> to provide an sdist->wheel autobuilding service for pypi. (Answer: maybe,
> though it would be
Final note after a long thread:
Just like Nick pointed out in his original post (if I read it right) , the
pip vs the conda approach comes down to this:
Do you want to a system to manage the whole stack? or do you want a
system to manage Python packages?
Personally, I think that no matter how
