On Sat, Jan 13, 2018, at 6:39 PM, Matthias Bussonnier wrote:
> Not opposing to open-id/Google-ID removal, but I would love to login-with-
> google, though because I already have an account (and can't associate
> my google account with the PyPI one) I'm not using login with google.
> Also it did not
python-social-auth supports OAuth 1, OAuth 2, OpenID, SAML with many auth
providers and python trsmeworks; including Pyramid, BitBucket, Google,
GitHub, GitLab,
https://python-social-auth.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
http://python-social-auth.readthedocs.io/en/latest/backends/
https://github.com/py
> * Very few people actually are using OpenID or Google logins as it is. In
one month we had ~15k logins using the web form, ~5k using basic auth, and
62 using Google and 7 using OpenID. This is a several orders of magnitude
difference.
Not opposing to open-id/Google-ID removal, but I would love t
Thank you, Steve.
Ok so, setuptools can successfully build extension modules with
Py_LIMITED_API on Windows, with a generic *.pyd suffix and no extra tags.
However, there are still two problems before I can distribute them:
1) it's not clear how wheels containing such extension modules should be
