I’m not knowledgable about GPUs, but from limited conversations with others,
it is important to first decide what exactly the problem area is. Unlike
currently
available environment markers, there’s currently not a very reliable way to
programmatically determine even if there is a GPU, let alone
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 at 13:33 Xavier Fernandez
wrote:
>
>
>
> Le ven. 31 août 2018 à 9:25 PM, Brett Cannon a écrit :
>
>>
>> OK, so let's look at what we're trying to support. If we have pure Python
>> code there's very likely going to be a bottom Python version that's
>> supported and then
Le ven. 31 août 2018 à 9:25 PM, Brett Cannon a écrit :
>
> OK, so let's look at what we're trying to support. If we have pure Python
> code there's very likely going to be a bottom Python version that's
> supported and then forward-compatibility is assumed. This is specified
> today through
Hi all, trying to pull together a few separate discussions into a
single thread here.
The main issue is that currently PEP 508 does not provide environment
markers for GPU/CUDA availability, which leads to problems for
projects that want to provide distributions for environments with and
without
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 at 01:41 Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 at 07:15, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 11:21 Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> > >> * Make the 3 tag categories totally independent.
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 23:13 Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 11:21 Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >>
> >> If we're going to rethink this,
> >
> >
> > Well, I didn't want to "rethink" so much as "fill in". :)
> >
> >>
>
Hi,
I was verifying my Pipenv resolver work, and found a quirk in pip when handling
-e requirements.
With a requirements.txt:
# Works as expected
colorama ; os_name == "nt"
# Works as expected
./colorama ; os_name == "nt"
# Drops markers; always installs disregarding the
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 at 07:15, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 11:21 Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >> * Make the 3 tag categories totally independent. Compute a separate set
> >> for each, and then take the full cross
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 11:21 Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> If we're going to rethink this,
>
>
> Well, I didn't want to "rethink" so much as "fill in". :)
>
>>
>> then I would really like to move away from assigning special meaning to
>>
> On Aug 30, 2018, at 9:54 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> I initially thought 'packaging', but I also don't want to care about Python
> 2. :) So I haven't decided yet. At worst this just leads to a clearer
> understanding of how tools should do wheel compatibility matching.
If you want to get
10 matches
Mail list logo