On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 15:30, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 23:11, Paul Moore wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 12:16, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > > P.S. Paul asked how we can have manylinux tags without updating PEP
> > > 425 to include them, and the answer is that the actual
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 23:11, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 12:16, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > P.S. Paul asked how we can have manylinux tags without updating PEP
> > 425 to include them, and the answer is that the actual compatibility
> > tag spec is at
> >
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 12:16, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> P.S. Paul asked how we can have manylinux tags without updating PEP
> 425 to include them, and the answer is that the actual compatibility
> tag spec is at
> https://packaging.python.org/specifications/platform-compatibility-tags/
> and that
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 18:12, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> We could do the Windows thing, and have a plain "manylinux" tag that means
> "any recent-ish glibc-based Linux". Today it would be defined to be "any
> distro newer than CentOS 6". When CentOS 6 goes out of service, we could
> tweak the
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 5:18 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote:
>
> Thanks Nathaniel for the explanation.
>
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2018, at 4:39 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> > So the proposal here is to refactor the spec to match how this
> > actually works: the official definition of a manylinux_${glibc
> >
