New submission from Nathan R. Yergler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
PackageIndex._download_html (setuptools/package_index.py) attempts to detect if
an HTML page is a Subversion repository using the regular expression
r'Revision \d+:'. This breaks for Sourceforge subversion repositorie
Scripts need to address a callable, not a module. See
http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/setuptools#automatic-script-creation
and inline below for corrections.
On 7/5/07, Frank McIngvale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to use setuptools auto-script feature with standalone scripts
I just tried it and saw the error as Andrew described.
On 6/25/07, Andrew Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>
> > What platform are you on?
>
> Ubuntu GNU/Linux: both 6.10 x86_64 Python 2.4 as well as 7.04 i686
> Python 2.5.
> ___
On 4/24/07, Stanley A. Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to create a customized Fedora live CD with Python applications on
> it. The live CD requires rpm's of the applications. (The issues are
> similar to a customized Ubuntu live CD but Ubuntu requires deb's.)
>
> It seems that the distu
I'm working on an improvement to my RDFa parser and because it will
rely on an external tool, I'm using an extra to require it to be
explicitly required. Is there a way to tell at runtime if an egg (for
the code running) was installed with an extra. For example, detecting
the difference between:
Thanks guys, that helps a lot.
On 3/15/07, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:48 AM 3/15/2007 -0400, Nathan R. Yergler wrote:
> >I have a situation where I want to get the version of an egg that's
> >installed. I figured out the following, but wanted
I have a situation where I want to get the version of an egg that's
installed. I figured out the following, but wanted to know if I'm
missing something obvious that's easier::
>>> import pkg_resources
>>> p = pkg_resources.get_provider("cctagutils")
>>> for line in p.get_metadata_lines("PKG
Late reply...
On 3/8/07, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 7, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Nathan R. Yergler wrote:
>
> I meant to reply earlier. Sorry.
>
> > I had a problem come up today that I've run into before, and I'd like
> > to figure out a
I'm using zc,buildout to manage the development of a very simple web
application. I'd like to have a simple test runner that runs my
doctests, but have run into a slight problem. I'm using
wsgi_intercept to aid in testing, but unfortunately wsgi_intercept
isn't a proper Python package ("yet", acc
I had a problem come up today that I've run into before, and I'd like
to figure out a way to prevent it from sucking my time down in the
future. Several apps we run at Creative Commons use lxml
(http://codespeak.net/lxml) for XML, XSLT and XPath processing. lxml
builds on libxml2, and provides an
Forwarding to the list because I wasn't smart enough to "reply-all"...
-- Forwarded message ------
From: Nathan R. Yergler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 27, 2007 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Distutils] easy_install prefers source?
To: "Phillip J. Eby&q
At the PyCon sprints Jim and I were working with easy_install and
working_env under Windows and noticed some odd behavior. When within
an activated working environment, attempting to do something like:
c:\...>easy_install lxml==1.1
attempts to retrieve the source distribution rather than the ava
I'm using zc.buildout for a project that also utilizes a custom egg-info
writer. I specify the egg-info writer package as a setup_requires
package in setup.py. Of course, that doesn't trigger zc.buildout (er,
setuptools) to install that egg when I run buildout. I could work
around this by specif
I'm using zc.buildout for deploying a handful of applications, and one
of our dependencies doesn't have eggs or "correctly" formatted pages
(that would allow easy_install to track down the repository for direct
building from source). Does zc.buildout provide any way to build an egg
from a Subversi
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 10:08 +, Jorge Vargas wrote:
[snip]
> >
> I though zc goal was to build zope apps, on the other hand how much of
> a footprint do you actually need for ac.buildout package? do you need
> to distribute the whole package bungle with the install?
Well I think that Zope Cor
Thanks to Phillip for the insight into the interaction between
command-line arguments and options. So another question regarding error
reporting. When I so something like:
$ PYTHONPATH=lib/ python ez_setup.py --install-dir lib/ --script-dir
bin/ --site-dirs lib/ zope.testing
setuptools is boots
>> error: No urls, filenames, or requirements specified (see --help)
>
> When ez_setup.py sees any command-line arguments, it runs easy_install
> with them once setuptools is bootstrapped. EasyInstall then sees that
> there are only options and no arguments, so it complains. I'm not sure
> if th
I'm working on increasing my setuptools-foo-zen-karma-whatever, and have
a question. According to the docs at
http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EasyInstall#installation-instructions,
you just need to download ez_setup.py and run it to install setuptools.
I'm trying to install to a custom lo
18 matches
Mail list logo
