text is present or
not in the package (which is your original concern).
3. volunteers are reviewing that data for accuracy and correctness and
fixing it if needed.
4. eventually fixes are pushed back upstream.
There is also some Google summer of project
https://github.com/nexB/aboutcode/w
le maintenance burden.
Ronny:
I grok the general issue, but would you have a concrete example?
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
fter of
arcane code to drop from distutils and setuptools a good thing IMHO.
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
ssed in
> declarative metadata.
Indeed!
There is no magic and no free lunch there.
[1] https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp
[2] https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/1891
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.or
ite is in the making. [1]
The harder or impossible part would have be to clean up the 1000+ of
packages using this faulty classifier
But there is really only three of these [2] and all of them look
either pretty old or abandoned and none has its packages effectively
hosted or distributed on Pypi.
[1]
that
depends on distribute now.
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode Enterprise at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org
at
http://docs.python.org/2/using/cmdline.html#interface-options
The doc has a bug BTW:
Changed in version 2.5: Directories and zipfiles containing a
__main__.py file at the top level are now considered valid Python
scripts.
I tested it and this does not work in Pythin 2.5, only in 2.6
--
Philippe
/pombredanne/5281269
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode Enterprise at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman
calls setup.py install or
buildout bootstrap?
Is this something to promote?
How is this overlapping with other packaging approaches? or possibly
replacing them all?
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode Enterprise at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
From: Philippe Ombredanne pombreda...@nexb.com
On the other hand, I find it somewhat discomforting as an emerging
best way to package and distribute self-contained bootstrap scripts.
Virtualenv does it, distil
packaging-sig to umbrella
the entire packaging topics.
+1
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode Enterprise at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
+ybbtO1Snbtm3brjpl27Zt27Zt27b6Tye3b9J9k37YK9kv+2FmPMxkrC0vBQKKCgA
AIAGIUeqCCqFgEh/4AACRBQCAD8AFGFs4OVtbGNLpGRoYWdnbOTrTObk7GdnZmlqY0dq7qyhDAUDqZP
..
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org
On Mar 1, 2013 5:54 AM, Reinout van Rees rein...@vanrees.org wrote:
On 28-02-13 20:31, Ben Acland wrote:
tl;dr: how to handle build time dependencies between python modules
using buildout, without looking stupid or including .tar.gz files in my
repo.
numpy and scipy are a hell to install.
required eggs may have a relaxed
requirement on zc.recipe.egg?
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode Enterprise at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Reinout van Rees rein...@vanrees.org wrote:
On 17-02-13 03:25, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
The new bootstrap script for buildout 2.0 always attempt to download
distribute_setup.py instead if distribute is not available:
See:https://github.com/buildout/buildout
slash as
path separator. A path or file name must be interpreted as
relative to the root directory of a distribution archive.
Examples::
License-File: COPYING
License-File: COPYING.lib
License-File: docs/legal/APACHE.txt
License-File: docs/legal/NOTICE.txt
--
Philippe
arguments.
So any objections I brought here about the version schemes are
addressed by your answers :)
I particularly like the wording you have in the PEP where you
explicitly support but do not encourage more byzantine version
schemes.
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel submitted PEPs 425 and 427 to python-dev for acceptance, and I
have formally accepted 427 as BDFL delegate
(http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0427/).
This is awesome!
Congratulations to Daniel
--
Philippe
OK when pointed to
a buildout 2 version and produced the expected behavior
Or would a patch be welcomed?
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode Enterprise at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com
://github.com/pombredanne/buildout/tree/buildout_21dev
building a dist with setup.py
and asking for a buildout with version 2.1.0dev1 in your boostrap with
boostrap.py --version 2.1.0dev1 --find-links=some path to your built buildout
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
packages that responsible and consenting adults could use as they
please or something similar?
This is FWIW a common practice on Debian.
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode Enterprise at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com
their own scheme as long
as it sorts lexicographically (eventually by segments, with precedence
from left to right).
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode Enterprise at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com
it directly.
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode Enterprise at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
do you do in your project ?
I use a makefile, a clean.sh and a clean.bat to ensure support on most
OS whether or not make is available,
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode Enterprise at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Philippe Ombredanne
pombreda...@nexb.com wrote:
All:
I prepared a pull request https://github.com/buildout/buildout/pull
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Philippe Ombredanne
pombreda...@nexb.com wrote:
I prepared a pull request https://github.com/buildout/buildout/pull/51
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Philippe Ombredanne
pombreda...@nexb.com wrote:
A python implementation of the proposed draft would have to monkey
patch standard functions (platform.version, platform.machine
this would be possible as the sections are skipped
before annotating
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode Enterprise at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Philippe Ombredanne
pombreda...@nexb.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, it would be nice to have this info on the output of buildout
annotate
I am not sure this would be possible
do not think this is a big concern.
- if you do not use expressions in your buildout, there is no impact at all.
Feedback on the code and features is welcomed... ATM the code is ready
to pull in and all the tests are passing
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
On 21/01/2013 09:36, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Chris Withersch...@simplistix.co.uk
wrote:
See the attached .tgz, here's what I did on a mac min running 10.7.4:
/Library/Python/2.7
/
versions = versions
[versions]
setuptools = 0.6c11
Not sure it would help, but worth a try
--
Philippe Ombredanne
+1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com
DejaCode Enterprise at http://www.dejacode.com
nexB Inc. at http://www.nexb.com
___
Distutils-SIG
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Philippe Ombredanne
pombreda...@nexb.com wrote:
...
IMHO it is not possible today to bootstrap and buildout offline. Anyone with
a better story there?
To peal this a bit further.
- It's
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Philippe Ombredanne
pombreda...@nexb.com wrote:
IMHO it is not possible today to bootstrap and buildout offline. Anyone with
a better story there?
Try:
install-from-cache = true
without
34 matches
Mail list logo