tion does it break something if package 'aaa.bbb'
wouldn't list itself in a namespace_package? And does it provide something
useful if package 'aaa.bbb' would?
Best regards,
rik
P.J. Eby wrote:
At 01:07 PM 2/8/2011 +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote:
P.J. Eby wrote:
At 12:06 AM
P.J. Eby wrote:
At 12:06 AM 2/8/2011 +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote:
but one is initial provider of 'aaa' share
and other consumer of 'aaa' share.
This statement is why you're confused. A namespace is not "provided"
by anyone, only participated in.
No I am con
P.J. Eby wrote:
At 02:12 PM 2/4/2011 +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote:
Hi,
Let suppose that we have package aaa and subpackage bbb and we are
going
to write setup.py for bbb using setuptools:
extra = dict(
namespace_packages=["aaa", "aaa.bbb"],
zip_safe = False,
eq 'aaa', and must not list any
namespaces it is provides,
in this case 'aaa.bbb'? So correct value namespace_packages=['aaa'] in
the case above.
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
Phillip J. Eby:
> At 01:06 PM 12/28/2006 +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote:
>> Any comments (keepalivemessage)?
>
> Unfortunately, the distutils aren't really actively maintained by anyone
> (except to do bug fixes), which is probably why you haven't received
> any reply.
Any comments (keepalivemessage)?
rik
Roman Kurakin:
> While working on one project I've met a problem that I can't to specify to
> not touch my configuration files for python package that uses setup.py
> technique. To solve this problem I've implemented the following solu
While working on one project I've met a problem that I can't to specify to
not touch my configuration files for python package that uses setup.py
technique. To solve this problem I've implemented the following solution
that works for me. If this idea worths it, I can make a patch relative
needed
v
