On Nov 14, 2012, at 2:23 AM, Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com wrote:
On 13 Nov, 2012, at 17:21, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:10:30 +0100,
Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com a écrit :
On 13 Nov, 2012, at 16:00, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com
On 14 November 2012 12:04, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
That has been tried already (setuptools, distribute, distutils2). Instead,
try bento (http://cournape.github.com/Bento/).
Hilariously everyone I've showed it to is immediately put off by the
indentation based syntax (who would
Well, you can build eggs with Bento, and I have a patch that allows it to
build wheels, in both cases it will produce pip-compatible metadata. The
Bento author has his own informed opinions about the way packaging should
work which do not necessarily include the packaging PEPs.
Am 13.11.12 03:04, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com
mailto:dho...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Metadata 1.3 is done. Who would like to czar?
(Apologies for the belated reply, it's been a busy few weeks)
I'm happy to be BDFL delegate for
On 13.11.2012 10:51, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 13.11.12 03:04, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com
mailto:dho...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Metadata 1.3 is done. Who would like to czar?
(Apologies for the belated reply, it's been a busy few
On 13 November 2012 10:26, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
I agree with Martin. If the point is to to protect against cryptography
that is not used, then not using the de-facto standard in signing
open source distribution files, which today is PGP/GPG, misses that
point :-)
I agree as
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 5:26 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 13.11.2012 10:51, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 13.11.12 03:04, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com
mailto:dho...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Metadata 1.3 is done. Who
Am 13.11.12 11:26, schrieb M.-A. Lemburg:
Note that signing such distribution files can be handled outside
of the wheel format PEP. It just way to complex and out of scope
for the wheel format itself. Also note that PGP/GPG and the other
signing tools work well on any distribution file. There's
I want to remove distutils from the standard library. If that happens
then we might want a secure way to install it from pypi. One way would
be to include the public key used to sign distutils in Python's own
signature-verifying bootstrap wheel installer, never mind whether it
used ECDSA or RSA
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.dewrote:
I want to remove distutils from the standard library. If that happens
then we might want a secure way to install it from pypi. One way would
be to include the public key used to sign distutils in Python's own
On 13 Nov, 2012, at 17:21, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:10:30 +0100,
Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com a écrit :
On 13 Nov, 2012, at 16:00, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to remove distutils from the standard library.
Why?
11 matches
Mail list logo
