Fred Drake wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
I guess my point is that, by way of being based on setuptools, buildout
already *is* case insensitive w.r.t. distribution names and the fact that
*only* version pinning *is* case sensitive ends up being a bug...
The fix f
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> I guess my point is that, by way of being based on setuptools, buildout
> already *is* case insensitive w.r.t. distribution names and the fact that
> *only* version pinning *is* case sensitive ends up being a bug...
The fix for probably incl
Benji York wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
I guess my point is that, by way of being based on setuptools, buildout
already *is* case insensitive w.r.t. distribution names and the fact that
*only* version pinning *is* case sensitive ends up being a bug...
I guess t
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> I guess my point is that, by way of being based on setuptools, buildout
> already *is* case insensitive w.r.t. distribution names and the fact that
> *only* version pinning *is* case sensitive ends up being a bug...
I guess that might be con
Benji York wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Fred Drake wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
As such, I'd expect buildout's version pinning to be case agnostic as well.
What do other people feel about this?
I've seen very few cases where case-insensitivity in
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Fred Drake wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Chris Withers
> wrote:
>> As such, I'd expect buildout's version pinning to be case agnostic as well.
>> What do other people feel about this?
> I've seen very few cases where case-insensitivity in package na
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
> As such, I'd expect buildout's version pinning to be case agnostic as well.
> What do other people feel about this?
A lot of case-insensitivity is present for dealing with
case-insensitive file systems; when looking at a distribution, the
c
Hi All,
The following buildout.cfg demonstrates something that feels buggy to me:
[buildout]
parts = sqlalchemy migrate
versions = versions
[versions]
SQLAlchemy = 0.6.0
sqlalchemy = 0.6.2
[sqlalchemy]
recipe = zc.recipe.egg
eggs = SQLAlchemy
entry-points = foo=bar:baz
[migrate]
recipe = zc.r
