Holger, has this happened yet?
> On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:23 PM, holger krekel wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:45 -0600, Ian Cordasco wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>>>
On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:25 AM, holger krekel wrote:
Hi Donald,
On
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 15:29 -0600, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:23 PM, holger krekel wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:45 -0600, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:25 AM, holger krekel wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:23 PM, holger krekel wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:45 -0600, Ian Cordasco wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:25 AM, holger krekel wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Donald,
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 19:43 -0
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:45 -0600, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> >
> >> On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:25 AM, holger krekel wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Donald,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 19:43 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2014, at 9:21 PM, D
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
>> On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:25 AM, holger krekel wrote:
>>
>> Hi Donald,
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 19:43 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Nov 13, 2014, at 9:21 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
Starting a new thread with more explicit d
> On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:25 AM, holger krekel wrote:
>
> Hi Donald,
>
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 19:43 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
>>> On Nov 13, 2014, at 9:21 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>>>
>>> Starting a new thread with more explicit details at Richard’s request.
>>> Essentially the tl;dr here i
Hi Donald,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 19:43 -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
> > On Nov 13, 2014, at 9:21 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> >
> > Starting a new thread with more explicit details at Richard’s request.
> > Essentially the tl;dr here is that we'll switch to using sha2 (specifically
> > sha256).
>
> On Nov 13, 2014, at 9:21 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> Starting a new thread with more explicit details at Richard’s request.
> Essentially the tl;dr here is that we'll switch to using sha2 (specifically
> sha256).
Ping?
Are we OK to make this change?
---
Donald Stufft
PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 63
Hi Donald,
thanks for the detail and the pre-announcement!
I am all for the change but indeed need to check how devpi code is affected
(pretty sure it is) and how to accomodate the change. Will see to do so
next week and get back to this thread.
best,
holger
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 21:21 -0500
+1 thanks for the detail
On 14 November 2014 13:21, Donald Stufft wrote:
> Starting a new thread with more explicit details at Richard’s request.
> Essentially the tl;dr here is that we'll switch to using sha2 (specifically
> sha256).
>
>
> Simple API
> --
>
> Drop the #md5= from the PyP
Starting a new thread with more explicit details at Richard’s request.
Essentially the tl;dr here is that we'll switch to using sha2 (specifically
sha256).
Simple API
--
Drop the #md5= from the PyPI hosted tarballs and replace it with #sha256, the
~60 or so externally hosted files which
11 matches
Mail list logo