On 10/4/06, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:12 PM 10/3/2006 +0100, Paul Moore wrote:
Also, the automatic pause would annoy me. How would you make it *not*
happen if I ran the command from a console window I already had open?
The idea would be to register a separate
Jim Fulton wrote:
...
This will probably break buildout's bootstrapping script, which uses
ez_setup.
I was too hasty in making this remark. The buildout bootstrap script,
http://svn.zope.org/zc.buildout/trunk/bootstrap/bootstrap.py?view=markup
Uses the use_setup function from ez_setup.py
On 10/3/06, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:43 PM 10/3/2006 +0100, Paul Moore wrote:
On 10/3/06, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we make more effort to create a usable command-line experience on
Windows? Perhaps use a post-install script to register easy_install
At 09:23 AM 10/4/2006 +0100, Paul Moore wrote:
On 10/4/06, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:12 PM 10/3/2006 +0100, Paul Moore wrote:
Also, the automatic pause would annoy me. How would you make it *not*
happen if I ran the command from a console window I already had open?
The idea
On 10/4/06, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah crap. I wonder if there's any way to tell whether you're the only
process on a particular console? That would fix this, I guess. There's a
GetConsoleProcessList() API, but it doesn't even work on Win2K as far as I
can tell; a minimum of
I'm working on new installation instructions for setuptools 0.6c4, which
will no longer use ez_setup.py for end-user manual installation of
setuptools (as opposed to bundled installation with another package).
The basic idea is that the PyPI page for setuptools would contain these
On 10/3/06, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cygwin, Mac OS X, Linux, Other
==
1. Download the appropriate egg for your version of Python (e.g.
``setuptools-0.6c4-py2.4.egg``). Do NOT rename it.
2. Make it executable (e.g. ``chmod +x
At 02:40 PM 10/3/2006 -0700, Bob Ippolito wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier to just tell them to do sh
./setuptools-0.6c4-py2.4.egg instead of marking it executable first?
I found the phrasing much more awkward that way, as it led to having to
explain the idea that it's got a shell script in there.
On 10/3/06, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:40 PM 10/3/2006 -0700, Bob Ippolito wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier to just tell them to do sh
./setuptools-0.6c4-py2.4.egg instead of marking it executable first?
I found the phrasing much more awkward that way, as it led to having to
At 10:43 PM 10/3/2006 +0100, Paul Moore wrote:
On 10/3/06, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we make more effort to create a usable command-line experience on
Windows? Perhaps use a post-install script to register easy_install so it
works from Start/Run, with an automatic pause to
At 06:14 PM 10/3/2006 -0400, bear wrote:
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
RPM-Based Systems
=
Install setuptools using the provided source RPM. The included ``.spec``
file assumes you are installing using the default ``python`` executable,
and is thus not specific to a particular Python
11 matches
Mail list logo
