On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:17 PM, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
> It's not clear to me that there's much need for new packaging tools in older
> versions.
I've certainly found it useful to use distribute under Python 2.4.
There are still a lot of people using Python 2.4.
I think the general rule for pa
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:17 PM, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
> [..]
>>
>> I don't need 2.3. I don't need 2.4 either. I was actually wondering if the
>> "2.4" was a typo.
>>
>> It's not clear to me that there's much need for new packaging tools in
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:17 PM, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
[..]
>
> I don't need 2.3. I don't need 2.4 either. I was actually wondering if the
> "2.4" was a typo.
>
> It's not clear to me that there's much need for new packaging tools in older
> versions.
Some people are building new code that ne
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:44 PM, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
The rest of the work will happen in distutils2 and we will try to
release a version asap for Python 2.x and 3.x (2.4 to 3.2), and the
goal
is to put it back in the stdlib in Python 3.3
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:44 PM, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
> Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>
>> The rest of the work will happen in distutils2 and we will try to
>> release a version asap for Python 2.x and 3.x (2.4 to 3.2), and the
>> goal
>> is to put it back in the stdlib in Python 3.3
>
> Er... 2.4? Real
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
The rest of the work will happen in distutils2 and we will try to
release a version asap for Python 2.x and 3.x (2.4 to 3.2), and the
goal
is to put it back in the stdlib in Python 3.3
Er... 2.4? Really?
--rich
___
Distutils-SIG ma
FIY (I didn't cross-post to make it easier for following the threads)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tarek Ziadé
Date: Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:44 PM
Subject: The fate of Distutils in Python 2.7
To: Python-Dev
Hello,
This is a follow-up of the Pycon summit + sprints on packagin
