Re: [Distutils] New PyPUG Tutorials

2015-11-17 Thread Marcus Smith
yea, I was thinking the same. but we'll see how the initial reorg goes. On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 16 November 2015 at 03:49, Marcus Smith wrote: > >> > >> To have the most success, the writers will certainly need feedback from > >> subject matter experts, so the

Re: [Distutils] New PyPUG Tutorials

2015-11-15 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 16 November 2015 at 03:49, Marcus Smith wrote: >> >> To have the most success, the writers will certainly need feedback from >> subject matter experts, so the process will include 2 stages where we >> specifically ask for feedback from PyPA-Dev and Distutils-Sig: 1) To >> validate the initial

Re: [Distutils] New PyPUG Tutorials

2015-11-15 Thread Marcus Smith
> > > To have the most success, the writers will certainly need feedback from > subject matter experts, so the process will include 2 stages where we > specifically ask for feedback from PyPA-Dev and Distutils-Sig: 1) To > validate the initial proposal that covers the scope of the changes, and 2)

Re: [Distutils] New PyPUG Tutorials

2015-10-28 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 26 Oct 2015 01:10, "Paul Moore" wrote: > > On 24 October 2015 at 20:25, Marcus Smith wrote: > > As someone who has slowly chipped away on the PyPUG for the last 2 years, > > I'm excited about the prospect of being able to make a big jump in quality > > very quickly. > > Agreed - this is great

[Distutils] New PyPUG Tutorials

2015-10-25 Thread Marcus Smith
As some of you may already know, Nicole from the Warehouse team has initiated an effort to improve our packaging tutorials, and have them linked in the new Warehouse UI (https://github.com/pypa/warehouse/issues/729 ). Although originally the idea was to create additional tutorials (but still maint

Re: [Distutils] New PyPUG Tutorials

2015-10-25 Thread Paul Moore
On 24 October 2015 at 20:25, Marcus Smith wrote: > As someone who has slowly chipped away on the PyPUG for the last 2 years, > I'm excited about the prospect of being able to make a big jump in quality > very quickly. Agreed - this is great news :-) Paul __