Re: [Distutils] PEP 517 reference consumer

2017-11-16 Thread Paul Moore
On 16 November 2017 at 15:04, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > We have now done this, and you can see the new repo here: > > https://github.com/pypa/pep517 I've set up a PEP 517 Committers group under the PyPA organisation. At the moment only Thomas and I are members - if anyone

Re: [Distutils] PEP 517 reference consumer

2017-11-16 Thread Thomas Kluyver
We have now done this, and you can see the new repo here: https://github.com/pypa/pep517 On Thu, Nov 16, 2017, at 01:31 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > I'm happy to (not sure what needs to be done, but I'm sure I can > muddle it through ;-)) > Paul > > On 16 November 2017 at 13:16, Thomas Kluyver

Re: [Distutils] PEP 517 reference consumer

2017-11-16 Thread Paul Moore
I'm happy to (not sure what needs to be done, but I'm sure I can muddle it through ;-)) Paul On 16 November 2017 at 13:16, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > On 16 November 2017 at 21:22, Thomas Kluyver

Re: [Distutils] PEP 517 reference consumer

2017-11-16 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 16 November 2017 at 21:22, Thomas Kluyver > wrote:>> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017, at 10:51 PM, Nick > Coghlan wrote: >> > +1 from me, too. >> >> Whose further agreement should we get for this? And - if there is >>

Re: [Distutils] PEP 517 reference consumer

2017-11-16 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 16 November 2017 at 21:22, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017, at 10:51 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > +1 from me, too. > > Whose further agreement should we get for this? And - if there is > agreement - how do we do the transfer? If someone briefly gives me >

Re: [Distutils] PEP 517 reference consumer

2017-11-16 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017, at 10:51 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > +1 from me, too. Whose further agreement should we get for this? And - if there is agreement - how do we do the transfer? If someone briefly gives me permission to create repos in the PyPA org, I can use Github's transfer feature.

Re: [Distutils] PEP 517 reference consumer

2017-11-12 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 13 November 2017 at 04:59, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > I have found a bit more time to work on my PEP 517 consumer API: > > https://github.com/takluyver/pep517 > > It provides two main interfaces: > - 'pep517.wrappers' is a lower-level interface to call the backend hooks > in

Re: [Distutils] PEP 517 reference consumer

2017-11-12 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017, at 07:21 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > Is it (in your opinion) something that pip might be able to use? The > biggest potential hurdle, I would imagine, is that if pep517.envbuild > uses pip to install dependencies, and pip uses pep517.envbuild, > there's a risk of a recursive loop

Re: [Distutils] PEP 517 reference consumer

2017-11-12 Thread Paul Moore
On 12 November 2017 at 18:59, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > I have found a bit more time to work on my PEP 517 consumer API: > > https://github.com/takluyver/pep517 > > It provides two main interfaces: > - 'pep517.wrappers' is a lower-level interface to call the backend hooks > in

[Distutils] PEP 517 reference consumer

2017-11-12 Thread Thomas Kluyver
I have found a bit more time to work on my PEP 517 consumer API: https://github.com/takluyver/pep517 It provides two main interfaces: - 'pep517.wrappers' is a lower-level interface to call the backend hooks in a subprocess. - 'pep517.envbuild' is a higher-level interface which creates a