[Distutils] Re: The base docker images for manylinux appear to be private

2020-02-27 Thread Thomas Kluyver
No problem. It is a bit confusing that it's tagged as though it's going to be uploaded. On Thu, Feb 27, 2020, at 12:41 PM, Sylvain Corlay wrote: > Thanks Thomas, I was mistaken by the first line of the docker image which > includes a full URL on quay.io > > > FROM quay.io/pypa/manylinux2010_ce

[Distutils] Re: The base docker images for manylinux appear to be private

2020-02-27 Thread Sylvain Corlay
Thanks Thomas, I was mistaken by the first line of the docker image which includes a full URL on quay.io FROM quay.io/pypa/manylinux2010_centos-6-no-vsyscall We will build this image ourself. Best, On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:38 AM Thomas Kluyver wrote: > To be precise, these are not uploaded

[Distutils] Re: The base docker images for manylinux appear to be private

2020-02-26 Thread Thomas Kluyver
To be precise, these are not uploaded at all - there's no hidden repository on quay.io AFAICT, and I'm an owner of the pypa team there. The CI on the manylinux repo always builds both stages one after the other. They're split as an implementation detail - if I recall correctly, doing everything

[Distutils] Re: The base docker images for manylinux appear to be private

2020-02-26 Thread Sylvain Corlay
I am fine with there being a specific base image but I think that it should be pullable. On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 04:06 Wes Turner wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, 10:03 PM Wes Turner wrote: > >> >> Is there a reason the new manylinux does not just extend centos:6? >> > > https://github.com/pypa

[Distutils] Re: The base docker images for manylinux appear to be private

2020-02-25 Thread Wes Turner
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, 10:03 PM Wes Turner wrote: > > Is there a reason the new manylinux does not just extend centos:6? > https://github.com/pypa/manylinux/blob/master/docker/glibc/README.rst : > Summary: Because of https://mail.python.org/pipermail/wheel-builders/2016-December/000239.html, thi

[Distutils] Re: The base docker images for manylinux appear to be private

2020-02-25 Thread Wes Turner
I agree. The manylinux docker images should be entirely reproducible from source. Is there a reason the new manylinux does not just extend centos:6? https://github.com/pypa/manylinux/blame/master/docker/Dockerfile-x86_64 https://discuss.python.org/t/manylinux2010-docker-image-now-available/1471

[Distutils] Re: The base docker images for manylinux appear to be private

2020-02-25 Thread scottdaniel760--- via Distutils-SIG
Like to no more distutils images. -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- distutils-sig@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to distutils-sig-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/distutils-sig@python