Re: [Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-04 Thread Jim Fulton
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Alex Clark wrote: ... > Personally, when I run -v or -vv or - I expect to see debug output, not > necessarily something that is formatted for other purposes… for whatever > that is worth. -v is verbose. -vv is debug I don't think additional "v"s have any effe

Re: [Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-04 Thread Alex Clark
On 2013-01-04 14:32:06 +, Jim Fulton said: On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Chris Withers wrote: ... - if a file is specified (which can be buildout.cfg), append those those un-pinned versions to the end of that file Got it. ...rather than just doing the right thing and telling you wh

Re: [Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-04 Thread Jim Fulton
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Chris Withers wrote: ... >>> - if a file is specified (which can be buildout.cfg), append those those >>> un-pinned versions to the end of that file >> >> >> Got it. > > > ...rather than just doing the right thing and telling you what it did ;-) I have no idea what

Re: [Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-04 Thread Chris Withers
On 04/01/2013 14:32, Jim Fulton wrote: On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Chris Withers wrote: ... - if a file is specified (which can be buildout.cfg), append those those un-pinned versions to the end of that file Got it. ...rather than just doing the right thing and telling you what it did

Re: [Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-04 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 01:15:05PM +, Chris Withers wrote: > On 04/01/2013 13:03, Jim Fulton wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Chris Withers wrote: > >>- if a python version is specified, blow up if a different version is used > >>to run buildout. > > > >That's an interesting one no on

Re: [Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-04 Thread Chris Withers
On 04/01/2013 13:03, Jim Fulton wrote: On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Chris Withers wrote: ... thing and http://packages.python.org/buildout_versions/index.html doesn't state what problem it solves. Try http://packages.python.org/buildout_versions/use.html Right, that lacks the summary yo

Re: [Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-04 Thread Jim Fulton
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Chris Withers wrote: ... >> thing and http://packages.python.org/buildout_versions/index.html doesn't >> state >> what problem it solves. > > > Try http://packages.python.org/buildout_versions/use.html Right, that lacks the summary you previde below. > > The basic

Re: [Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-04 Thread Chris Withers
On 03/01/2013 16:09, Reinout van Rees wrote: On 03-01-13 14:03, Marius Gedminas wrote: buildout-versions is a clone of buildout.dumppickedversions Note that one of the big improvements of buildout-versions over buildout.dumppickedversions is that it deals more graceful with differently-cased p

Re: [Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-04 Thread Chris Withers
Hi Jim, On 03/01/2013 12:35, Jim Fulton wrote: Yeah, the stuff that buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions provide should just be in the core. Jim, if I worked up a pull request would you merge it? Maybe :) I tried to look at buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions and I

Re: [Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-03 Thread Reinout van Rees
On 03-01-13 14:03, Marius Gedminas wrote: buildout-versions is a clone of buildout.dumppickedversions Note that one of the big improvements of buildout-versions over buildout.dumppickedversions is that it deals more graceful with differently-cased package names. "Fabric" versus "fabric", for

Re: [Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-03 Thread Jim Fulton
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 07:35:20AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Chris Withers >> wrote: >> > Yeah, the stuff that buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions >> > provide should just be in the core. >

Re: [Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-03 Thread Benji York
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Reinout van Rees wrote: > On 03-01-13 14:03, Marius Gedminas wrote: > >> I consider buildout-versions to be essential for my use of buildout. > > > Agreed. I'm using 2.0a for a personal project now, but I cannot > realistically use it for projects I work on with oth

Re: [Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-03 Thread Reinout van Rees
On 03-01-13 14:03, Marius Gedminas wrote: I consider buildout-versions to be essential for my use of buildout. Agreed. I'm using 2.0a for a personal project now, but I cannot realistically use it for projects I work on with others without something like buildout-versions. Personally, a "wa

Re: [Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-03 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 07:35:20AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Chris Withers > wrote: > > Yeah, the stuff that buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions > > provide should just be in the core. > > > > Jim, if I worked up a pull request would you merge it?

[Distutils] buildout.dumppickedversions and buildout_versions

2013-01-03 Thread Jim Fulton
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Chris Withers wrote: > On 15/12/2012 09:33, Lele Gaifax wrote: >> >> Alex Clark writes: >> >>> 19:43 < cullerton> Folks, there's something wonky going on with >>> buildout this morning. When I run bootstrap, it creates a buildout >>> script using buildout 2.0. >>